marylamby
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2019
- Messages
- 1,921
- Reaction score
- 26,675
Hahaha, you little faker you!This is my third and I'm questioning whether a 4th is on the menu.
Hahaha, you little faker you!This is my third and I'm questioning whether a 4th is on the menu.
During the PE interview with LS, she mentioned the neighbor of the Salida property search. The search that was done through concrete and sifted through for days.
Now that we finally have confirmation, I heard the neighbor’s call to DWAP (I’m not linking it as he is not approved). However, the information is now MSM with this interview.
I happened to stumble upon the gentleman she called after the search commenced. It was a live video.. (They are friendly and her call was informal but informative) She stated she had taken some photos and video because there was a man and a woman at the job site very early in the morning on MD weekend. She took the photos to send to the property owner as they live off site. It struck her as odd, both with the holiday and the early hours. She heard the heavy equipment and got up to see what was happening. She did not put this piece with the missing person until she heard the following week.
Then she heard about SM’s disappearance and immediately called it in. MOO, this is what LS confirmed tonight.
To clarify: This is the neighbor of the building site not the M home.
You couldn't tell by my posts?.....Hahaha, you little faker you!
I'll go back to my very basic question: How do we KNOW that is the spot? Because BM said it was? Or because some third party like LE or a searcher confirmed it?
During the PE interview with LS, she mentioned the neighbor of the Salida property search. The search that was done through concrete and sifted through for days.
Now that we finally have confirmation, I heard the neighbor’s call to DWAP (I’m not linking it as he is not approved). However, the information is now MSM with this interview.
I happened to stumble upon the gentleman she called after the search commenced. It was a live video.. (They are friendly and her call was informal but informative) She stated she had taken some photos and video because there was a man and a woman at the job site very early in the morning on MD weekend. She took the photos to send to the property owner as they live off site. It struck her as odd, both with the holiday and the early hours. She heard the heavy equipment and got up to see what was happening. She did not put this piece with the missing person until she heard the following week.
Then she heard about SM’s disappearance and immediately called it in. MOO, this is what LS confirmed tonight.
To clarify: This is the neighbor of the building site not the M home.
Limburger cheese?? Are you German. The only people I know that eat that cheese are German. I say this without prejudice. My mother loves the stuff
I went to school with a girl whose mother would send it in her lunch! I wouldn’t let my mother do that
![]()
It was good discussion. Its nice to actually listen and discuss opposing views without twisting each others words or views, or even arguing over opinions. Have a 4th, its all good.You couldn't tell by my posts?.....
Nope. But I'm fading fast!You couldn't tell by my posts?.....
And you know this how?TD went to that bike spot originally, then went back to town and got set straight. It's not there, it's farther south on CR 225. So, TD came back and got as far south as Fooses creek bridge where BM found him, walked him further south around the corner of the "Y" and says "Here." So TD went back to town, slept on it in the WalMart parking lot, and came back to the same spot that he first went to, and told us that's where BM showed him it was. Then, he comes back and makes a new video in which he drives from the "Y" where BM showed him the bike was back to the exact same spot where he first started. Then, he goes back to town and runs into LS, takes her back up and shows her the same spot again! I have two conclusions:
(a) TD seems to me to be directionally challenged.
(b) I forgot the other one......I'm so confused!
Maybe the money is being spent on "supporting the well-being of Suzanne's family". You know like well permits, paving, that sort of thing?
Oh dear, now I have to watch it. Not sure I have it in me.i was just watching plunder's video about this info. but WOW! this is pretty major news! moo.
Lauren is going to interview this same person, I think. This should be very interesting.During the PE interview with LS, she mentioned the neighbor of the Salida property search. The search that was done through concrete and sifted through for days.
Now that we finally have confirmation, I heard the neighbor’s call to DWAP (I’m not linking it as he is not approved). However, the information is now MSM with this interview.
I happened to stumble upon the gentleman she called after the search commenced. It was a live video.. (They are friendly and her call was informal but informative) She stated she had taken some photos and video because there was a man and a woman at the job site very early in the morning on MD weekend. She took the photos to send to the property owner as they live off site. It struck her as odd, both with the holiday and the early hours. She heard the heavy equipment and got up to see what was happening. She did not put this piece with the missing person until she heard the following week.
Then she heard about SM’s disappearance and immediately called it in. MOO, this is what LS confirmed tonight.
To clarify: This is the neighbor of the building site not the M home.
What irritates me is when the PE team keep bringing up that she's a woman. A woman's view, etc.
Puleese, she's a journalist. A really good one.
Yes. In that video Lauren was clear that it was absolutely impossible for Suzanne to have ended up in the water, based on where the bike was allegedly found.
It’s around 100 yards away, and she would have been horribly injured if she crashed there.
So not only could she not have landed in water, but she would have struggled to even get there after the fact.
DWAP has a page on FB. Take anything he says with a big grain of salt.Lauren is going to interview this same person, I think. This should be very interesting.
What the heck is DWAP? Sorry, I'm relatively new. And, where can I also stumble upon this live interview?
I would love if you'd message me.![]()
Yeah, she's very careful in all the videos to take her time to respond. She's got it covered.I agree. I think Lauren really didn’t know how to respond when they asked her how she felt “as a woman” at the site. Were they asking if she felt safe? Were they talking about her kinship as a fellow female to Suzanne? As a female journalist? What??
They seem to be really nice guys and the format is off the cuff and times are crazy so I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt. But dudes-nobody is asking you how you felt as a male.
During the PE interview with LS, she mentioned the neighbor of the Salida property search. The search that was done through concrete and sifted through for days.
Now that we finally have confirmation, I heard the neighbor’s call to DWAP (I’m not linking it as he is not approved). However, the information is now MSM with this interview.
I happened to stumble upon the gentleman she called after the search commenced. It was a live video.. (They are friendly and her call was informal but informative) She stated she had taken some photos and video because there was a man and a woman at the job site very early in the morning on MD weekend. She took the photos to send to the property owner as they live off site. It struck her as odd, both with the holiday and the early hours. She heard the heavy equipment and got up to see what was happening. She did not put this piece with the missing person until she heard the following week.
Then she heard about SM’s disappearance and immediately called it in. MOO, this is what LS confirmed tonight.
To clarify: This is the neighbor of the building site not the M home.
I noticed in their first video, the one guy said something about Lauren "as a gal" and she got a funny look on her face and I hope she gave them heck after the second one, because she got a funny look then, too. And sorry, that is offensive without context, IMO.I agree. I think Lauren really didn’t know how to respond when they asked her how she felt “as a woman” at the site. Were they asking if she felt safe? Were they talking about her kinship as a fellow female to Suzanne? As a female journalist? What??
They seem to be really nice guys and the format is off the cuff and times are crazy so I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt. But dudes-nobody is asking you how you felt as a male.
This bike has been a thorn since the beginning. What if...
LE did not find the bike when they responded to the 911 call. When BM arrives home (clears throat) he locates the mangled bike and assumes they will all jump on the BM train?
It would explain his persistence as well as LE being adamant about not confirming.
Just some what if thoughts....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.