Pentagon to order security review, as questions mount over shooter's access
The decisions come as the incident once again raises concerns about the quality of the background checks being done for those in sensitive government positions, particularly for contractors. Shooter Aaron Alexis had been working as a defense subcontractor, and had his security clearance renewed just two months before the rampage -- despite a history of troubling and violent behavior. Twelve people, in addition to the gunman, were killed in the shooting
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ions-mount-over-shooter-access/#ixzz2fBSIGwk7
I don't care what anyone says, I think the FBI failed those innocent people. Unless I see otherwise, that's my story and I'm sticking to it! :gavel:
The problem I have now, is how many others are out there ticking and getting ready to explode? :dunno: Clearly they were conducting shoddy or lazy, or just plain incompetent background checks! IMO :twocents:
BBM
This guy had two documented incidences with improper use of a firearm (2004 Seattle(?) and 2010 Ft. Worth.) The first, they 'lost' the paperwork and the second time, they didn't press charges.
He was actively seeking treatment with the VA(!) for hearing voices.
He served in the USN after the first gun incident and was discharged honorably after the second. Apparently, his SC was renewed during the time he was 'hearing voices' and seeking help for it. This guy fell through a LOT of cracks - going all the way back (and maybe before) the lost paperwork in 2004 - had he been dealt with then (or before), this wouldn't have happened.
Background checks are only as good as the information entered on one's background.
jmo