UK Eliza & Henrietta Huszti, sisters both 32, CCTV captures them near a river at 2am, Aberdeen, 7 Jan 2025.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, they were meant to move out before the day of their disappearance, but for some reason they did not?
It says that the landlord said that they had meant to leave the tenancy days before they disappeared, presumably he went to see if they had moved out on 7 January.

If they hadn't left on the agreed date, then they would owe the landlord money for every extra day they stayed in the property.
 
A landlord expecting their tenants to vacate a property explains why he/she was the one to report them missing (without them being a live in landlord).

The release suggests the sisters led a settled life, in stable jobs, with friends in the town. But, it also seems they were ready to move on, at least living wise. Does that mean they were more unsettled than people believe? Is it all part of a broader plot to disappear?

This story gets stranger by the day.
 
A landlord expecting their tenants to vacate a property explains why he/she was the one to report them missing (without them being a live in landlord).

The release suggests the sisters led a settled life, in stable jobs, with friends in the town. But, it also seems they were ready to move on, at least living wise. Does that mean they were more unsettled than people believe? Is it all part of a broader plot to disappear?

This story gets stranger by the day.
I feel like there’s a lot that we don’t know about them and that maybe no one really knows about them and what’s happening here whether that be mental health related or activity related.

I posted last night that the bus route from the released image and even the area of reported housing to where they ended up is very similar to the path that was reported. We have questioned multiple times why they took the path they did and I’m wondering if that’s why. I don’t know why they would follow a bus path unless there was a bus running or maybe searching for something lost while on the bus, looking for someone? I’m not sure it also very likely could just be a coincidence that they took a similar path.
 
Last edited:
So, they were meant to move out before the day of their disappearance, but for some reason they did not?

I think that is correct. But then, elsewhere, we learn that "the landlord contacted the police after going round to their house where there were signs that the pair were looking to leave" (my emphasis). I'm struggling a bit with the vagueness of the language being used. Not for the first time, it is fair to say.
 
They could have been preparing for a while to depart (whether just from the property or from life completely, who knows)
Interesting case, it is a bit of a strange one.
I would guess there's things they didn't tell their family or that the family (understandably) don't want to reveal to the public.
 
I think that is correct. But then, elsewhere, we learn that "the landlord contacted the police after going round to their house where there were signs that the pair were looking to leave" (my emphasis). I'm struggling a bit with the vagueness of the language being used. Not for the first time, it is fair to say.
Maybe some of their belongings were already packed but not everything.

What on earth happened?
 
Although from the images the path is some distance from the river, being so cold and very likely icy at 2am, the icy path could easily explain one of them sliding and slipping into the river and the other one trying to help, but also falling in.
 
I think that is correct. But then, elsewhere, we learn that "the landlord contacted the police after going round to their house where there were signs that the pair were looking to leave" (my emphasis). I'm struggling a bit with the vagueness of the language being used. Not for the first time, it is fair to say.
I wonder if the landlord reported them because they owed money rather than because of a concern for their welfare or maybe what was left in the room made them concerned,maybe they had locked the door and left the keys inside the room with half packed bags. We know a mobile phone had been left.
 
Last edited:

Police: Missing sisters hunt not a criminal case​


Speaking at a media event by the River Dee, he said: "There are no suspects, this is not a criminal inquiry this is a missing persons inquiry."

He said the force had a "number of hypotheses" and they were remaining open-minded in terms of what may have happened.

One of the main theories was that the sisters had entered the water in the area being searched.

"What we do know is that, at the moment, CCTV provides that they entered a footpath adjacent to the River Dee and we have no trace of them leaving that footpath yet," he said.

"Inquiries continue to see if we can extend that timeline further."

 
IMO

They must have given a tenancy notice at least a month in advance. So, they have planned to end their lives for months/weeks (unless evicted). They hesitated, hence why they didn't move out on time, but probably knew they would have nowhere to go and left in the end.
 
Last edited:
Someone posted on the thread last week that they wondered if the sisters had gone down the river path to meet up with someone in a boat.

At the time i thought 'nah', but now i'm beginning to wonder.......

I think that any boat moving on the river would have been caught on cctv.
Yep and yep! I thought it was a bit far fetched also and it would have surely been picked up on some CCTV somewhere.
 
I think that is correct. But then, elsewhere, we learn that "the landlord contacted the police after going round to their house where there were signs that the pair were looking to leave" (my emphasis). I'm struggling a bit with the vagueness of the language being used. Not for the first time, it is fair to say.
The part about ‘looking to leave’ makes no sense to me.

Surely at end of tenancy the Landlord would have expected the tenants to have left or at least be in the process of leaving. Him / her contacting the police suggests more to me that they owed money or something.

I draw from this that the twins life wasn’t as ‘stable’ as has been reported in the media. Possibly at risk of having no where to live..

Stressful situations can lead to people feeling anxious and depressed so I think it further points to them intentionally ending up in the river - MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
663
Total visitors
738

Forum statistics

Threads
626,392
Messages
18,525,638
Members
241,037
Latest member
Erffswhs
Back
Top