OK, a group home is the perfect place for him.
Depending on the capabilities and skills of the particular group home he was assigned to, perhaps. Or perhaps the group home he is assigned to is incapable of ensuring his safety, the safety of others, and nurturing his capabilities, or is not set up for those with profound autism.
It's possible that the severity of his intellectual disabilities means that he needs a significantly higher level of care. That's kind of what I'm seeing, here, quite frankly. He's
not mentally ill. He is permanently intellectually disabled. That requires a completely different approach, than mental illness. The conduct of the home, with their "policies", appears to be that they considered him "mentally ill" and not permanently intellectually disabled. Two very different conditions, requiring different approaches to care and supervision.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/north-miami/article91472342.html
(A short digression. I personally dislike the generalist term "developmentally delayed", as I think it's a useless "PC" euphemism. It erroneously implies that "catching up" or "recovery" to a normal neurobehavioral developmental state is somehow "hopefully" possible, given the "proper" level of care and support, which is not evidenced
at all by outcomes, scientifically. This term "developmentally delayed", is now
quite confusing to the general public, IMO. Though it is now colloquially considered a pejorative term, the old descriptor "mentally retarded" was much more
realistically understood by the general public. I think the new DSM has done away with this term "mentally retarded", due solely to societal activist pressures. We all now have to "pretend" that the most profoundly intellectually disabled people, who need the most careful, loving, and secure level of care are just a little "delayed" and will "catch up" any day now to ordinary adults. We pretend that they are just "normal" adults who have some kind of situational mental illness. This is an
immense disservice to mentally disabled adults, IMO.)
Mr. Kinsey was, and is,
very devoted to caring for Mr. Soto, and very devoted to doing what he can
within the limits of his position to ensure his safety, and the safety of others. However, I personally think Mr. Soto's needs are
significantly more complex than the environment in which he was placed. And I think that this "wrong placement", in part, contributed
a lot to the frustrating and terrifying situation that occurred. Mr. Soto
should have been in a sheltered environment, that by its design and purpose, allowed him a lot of free movement, but ensured his safety, and prevented him from "wandering" and going into the street.
That certainly doesn't mean I think the officer that shot Mr. Kinsey is off the hook. The issues that crashed together during this encounter that lead to Mr.Kinsey's shooting, are
many, and difficult to solve quickly. IMO.