- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,204
- Reaction score
- 273,653
If the jury lets him walk, and then they find out he had previously killed his dad, they will be upset, imo.
They could introduce the killing, just not indicate it was his dad (or related).ok, I am trying to catch up. I have been watching the trial and I thought the judge ruled that no one could mention him killing his dad previously. However, during closing arguments he said Collin "had killed before". What did I miss?
Thank you. Makes you wonder what the jury is thinking about that.ok, I am trying to catch up. I have been watching the trial and I thought the judge ruled that no one could mention him killing his dad previously. However, during closing arguments he said Collin "had killed before". What did I miss?
Defense: the State wants you to decide the case based on moments. We want you to decide based on facts. Defense attacks the relationship the grandfather claims to have had with the defendant, and suggests the jury can therefore discredit his credibility.
Noticing the defense only says the victim "died".
MOO: Ah, but she didn't just "die", he made her dead.
Defense is suggesting the defendant "ushered" his mom inside, to avoid embarrassment.
MOO I'm not sure watering the words down will help.
JMO
If the jury lets him walk, and then they find out he had previously killed his dad, they will be upset, imo.
Imagine how he would treat a girlfriend or boyfriend.If I was the grandmother and they find him NG, I'd be very worried.
If they let him walk, he will kill someone else. I can't imagine having that on my conscience, it's very unfair that the jury don't have all the facts.
Imagine how he would treat a girlfriend or boyfriend.