great discussion ...
I read your posts about the dog/s and I wanted to throw some thoughts into your discussion.
Like you, I am not expert on K9 training but I do have some observations
about recent cases in FL that I would like to share.
In the case of Jessica Lunsford, dogs did not find her. She was taken across the street, buried next to the trailer.
She wasn't discovered for three weeks and that was only after Couey told them where to find her.
In the Trenton Duckett case, dogs did not find him. He is still missing.
Coralrose Fuller, 2 hours away from the Duckett case, K9 dogs did not find her either.
A neighbor found her body near her house while walking his dog. The neighbor found her, not the dog.
In Jennifer's case, I have little confidence in any tracking by the dog/s.
IMO, I would dismiss any reports about the K9 in this case unless someone can show me the validity of the tracking.
thanks again ~
Drumstick:
First of all, as you mentioned, neither of us is an expert in dogs.
It is not a perfect science, just a tool. Not every dog handler, every dog, or every police officer is perfect.
If you don't believe in dogs, just ask some "drug smuggler, who has been caught at an airport, or border crossing, on their ability to sniff out a certain odor.
If you think about it logically, dogs should and probably are not effective in areas where the person the dog is tracking lives. Why? Because one would think there would be numerous scents.
In the Trenton case, if his relatives or whomever, put that kid in a car and drove an hour away, a dog would not find him.
You have a better argument with the Jessica Lunsford case, but, then again, she was found close to home, where one would expect numerous scents of her to be found. Not to mention she was buried how many feet deep. Don't forget, it is more difficult to smell something buried 3 feet deep, than on the surface of the earth. It could also be dog error, handler error, or simply the dogs are not effective in finding buried people. If she was on the surface, I would agree with you 100%.
Also, why didnt' the police officer who searched that area by foot notice the disturbed earth where the little girl was buried? I think human error can be attributed to this case as well. LE is taught to look for disturbed earth when searching for missing people.
Again, I"m no expert. But, from what I have gathered, dogs are very useful in finding drugs, and finding scents of people. I just think that they are best in finding the trail of someone who is foreign to an area (somewhere the person does not reside, work, etc.).
Do I believe that the POI parked JK's car, walked past the past at HOTG, and went back to Mosaic? Yes, I think it is very possible. It is certain, NO. I don't trust anything 100%, and that includes myself. But, it is part of this picture.
Also, I have seen cases, numerous cases, on television, etc, where a criminal will leave a car after a chase, and the police dog will sniff the seat, and take a path right to the perp. Think about it, if this technology was useless, why would the police dept. use it in every county of this country? It is just that it has limitations, just like everything else. These dogs are tested all the time, and it is a proven tool.
Don't you find it kind of odd that of all the places in the world for that dog to track, he just happened to track the pOI back to Mosaic? What are the odds, one in a thousand, at best?
regardless of the dog argument, why in the world is this case unsolved? LE has a picture of the guy who parked the car, and a time, why can't they solve this case? And better yet, why not start over, call in everyone close to this investigation, (I can think of twenty of so people,) and give them all lie detector tests.
left