- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,857
- Reaction score
- 296,865
Twice even.He consented to the search of his phone. Bottom line. IMO
Twice even.He consented to the search of his phone. Bottom line. IMO
I sure hope so. How do you ignore that?
I am behind in watching,
and he even gave them the passcode , I remember b/c it was his birthday.,He did. Detective Tagler asked him if they could look at this phone or did they need to get a search warrant. He said that would be okay. Then she said "so I have your consent to look at your phone?" and he said yes.
It was on one of the early interview recordings.
I would be a horrible defence attorney trying to spin gold out of straw.Sad Defense argument: how can LE say they took his phone so he couldn't destroy evidence if he already destroyed the evidence?
(Because it autopopulates from Google, they wanted to preserve whatever might still be on the phone in the event he deleted evidence from his Google/cloud account.)
Currently he's got a despicable job.
If he indeed felt forced to give them consent that came from the angel on his right shoulder. The devil on his left was whispering "You'll be sorry if you do!".SS said he felt forced to give them consent? Rewind the tape he said " go for it" that doesn't sound like someone forced.
and I re listened to the interview and when he said "go for it", it was to look at his hands, not search the phone. So I stand corrected."My client was too stupid to realize his self confessed "accidental" factory reset and telling LE to "go for it" when asked if they could search his phone" is not a legal argument Just saying.
I for one would be very concerned if the SA charges were dropped. He is obviously guilty of the crime with no doubt. There is evidence that he disposed of the body. Where is the evidence that it was he who killed her? Don't get me wrong, I think he did kill her but I'm thinking about a jury here. There was another person in the house at the time. Some juror could have a reasonable doubt.What if all of the evidence on the phone is excluded? MS is still dead, and he did it. He isn't going to get out of that.
Not a chance.Fox News discussion on whether the phone and cloud will be allowed or suppressed. An expert believed judge may be leaning toward suppression and if so, then she thinks the whole case may be dropped. Naturally, here, we're thinking LE is planning to use a conviction on SA to get the death penalty in the murder trial.
"Last night, the judge overseeing the Suppression Hearing for Stephan Sterns said he will issue a written ruling on Stephan Sterns' motion to block evidence relating to his cell phone and Google account."
Very sobering video.
I certainly hope you're right. In addition to the defense attorney bring vigorous, the judge is taking everything seriously. No only is this a probable death penalty case (so as serious as it gets) there is also all the csam. Undoubtedly, he wants to review everything and be certain everything is handled properly.Not a chance.
Just a defense attorney being vigorous.
SS will never see freedom.
JMO
Link?Just for fun, everyone should see Jumpsuit Pablo's video on the court hearing yesterday. That guy is hilarious, just watch it for the entertainment value alone and a good laugh during this horrible case. The video is 20 minutes and is all about the root beer barrels. ( 9 min is the funniest part IMO )
Doesn’t look like anyone from her local family is there — more specifically, her mother JS is absent! Interesting. OMO.Maddie's bench has been placed. Jenny and her team did an amazing job of organizing and raising funds for it, and she continues to be an advocate for Maddie.
![]()
Madeline Soto remains a ‘Beacon of Hope’
City of St. Cloud honors her memory with Lakefront Park bench While the case of Stephan Sterns, the man accused of sexually abusing and killing Madeline Soto slowly works its way through the court system, advocates for the Kissimmee teen who tragically died 14 months ago are still working to...www.aroundosceola.com