RickshawFan
Verified Outdoor Recreation Specialist
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
- Messages
- 11,289
- Reaction score
- 57,001
Racial bias might have fueled her entitlement IMO, like pouring gas on a fire. It also might have made her jump to the conclusion that Herring could only be committing a crime (instead of having a medical event) and it was somehow heinous: she magnified the enormity of the event of him running away from a minor accident, as the pros pointed out. The savior/hero complex fits in there, too.I do think there was a racial component involved. Would she have eventually done something along these lines regardless of the other individual’s race? Most likely, IMO. But I think that Mr. Herring’s race caused her to believe she would be able to get away with violence and vigilantism and be treated like a hero. Glad the jury got it right and said “Not this time!”
MOO.
Rest in peace to Mr. Herring and may his memory be a blessing to all those who loved him. I hope this trial outcome at least gives them some semblance of peace and justice.
IMO There might also have been status elements ( wrongly construed by her) factored into her crime. Herring was driving a beater truck, so she might easily have jumped to conclusions about his demographic. HP was driving what she probably thought was a super fancy, hip, current, flashy, enviable rig. Attention-getting. Monied. No doubt, the balloon tires enhanced this image for her: hot!
(FWIW I don’t like jeeps with balloon wheels, and their owners tend not to be my type, so bias may be sutured into my point.)
IMO The trial gave the lie to an assumption about status, demographic, financial means, education, etc. I note the way the prosecution’s witnesses and family members presented—corresponding to the dividing lines in the gallery—versus everyone on the defense side. HP had her guesses inverted, historically biased, and blind to the real world, especially somewhere like Atlanta, which has long had a robust African-American upwardly mobile and very successful middle class.
Do we know anything about HP except this crime? Background? Education?
I love the idea that, in this trial, the victim had a jury of his peers. I also liked that these particular sheriff’s deputies in the courtroom implemented the verdict. I kept wondering what they were thinking: they might zone out in trials, but I have a feeling not this one. They seemed extra spiffed up, too. Not the perfect send off—RIP—but a good one.
Last edited: