Germany/Portugal - Christian Brueckner, 27 @ time of 1st crime (2004), charged with sexual assault crimes, Praia de Rocha, Portugal. #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #621
  • #622
This is the slowest court case in history :(
 
  • #623
I translated that Germany article into English - I hope! I shall use this as reference in my notes.

 
  • #624
This is the slowest court case in history :(

Here are the rest of the trial dates.

Trial dates: March 14, April 3, 5, 10, 12, 17, 19, 24, 25, May 2, 3 8, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, June 4, 5 6, 25, 26 & June 27, 2024. Expected to last up to 3 months.
 
  • #625
Are we not supposed to post the real names & not just initials? I shall find out...
Hi Niner! Please use initials.
 
  • #626
  • #627
From the Mirror live stream.

The judge is grilling Seyferth at length about "inconsistencies" between his evidence today and statements he previously gave to police.

Seyferth today told the court that he found Brueckner "arrogant" yet in an earlier interview Seyferth said Brueckner was an "evil psychopath".
Many psychoaths are also arrogant; I fail to see why one can't both.
 
  • #628
  • #629
So how can they have exact ages ?
I don’t think they do .On the charge sheet she’s referenced as “ at least 14 “ due to the victim being unidentifiable, so my interpretation is she could be anywhere from 14 up . MS has her as 15 unsure of HeB . It’s within the appropriate age range.
 
  • #630
I don’t think they do .On the charge sheet she’s referenced as “ at least 14 “ due to the victim being unidentifiable, so my interpretation is she could be anywhere from 14 up . MS has her as 15 unsure of HeB . It’s within the appropriate age range.

Agreed - they are just representative.

If they knew who the victims were, but were protecting identity, it would be handled differently - e.g. 'Frau X"
 
  • #631
A clean and sober Mr B , one creepy looking human being .
IMG_0827.jpeg
 
  • #632
From the Mail, are HeB and MS lining up their ducks.

S said he had told Busching to get rid of the tapes on the camera as he didn't want anything to do with them. He then said they had lost contact.

But his version fell apart after he later admitted to the judge that he had spoken to Busching on the phone on Thursday morning.

The judge ordered S mobile to be confiscated and it later emerged that he had spoken with him twice just before giving evidence and again two further times.
 
  • #633
Here are the rest of the trial dates.

Trial dates: March 14, April 3, 5, 10, 12, 17, 19, 24, 25, May 2, 3 8, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, June 4, 5 6, 25, 26 & June 27, 2024. Expected to last up to 3 months.
So little danger of the judges coming to a hasty decision.
 
  • #634
From the Mail, are HeB and MS lining up their ducks.

S said he had told Busching to get rid of the tapes on the camera as he didn't want anything to do with them. He then said they had lost contact.

But his version fell apart after he later admitted to the judge that he had spoken to Busching on the phone on Thursday morning.

The judge ordered S mobile to be confiscated and it later emerged that he had spoken with him twice just before giving evidence and again two further times.

So here is the problem with this reporting. Pisa consistently says that they saw the American woman raped on the video. But we know that is not correct.

Basically I don't trust any of what is in the Daily Fail.
 
  • #635
I don’t think they do .On the charge sheet she’s referenced as “ at least 14 “ due to the victim being unidentifiable, so my interpretation is she could be anywhere from 14 up . MS has her as 15 unsure of HeB . It’s within the appropriate age range.

Agree, and also, if the prosecution had a confirmed id, then they'd also likely have some type of witness statement and a date or at least an approximate date for the attack on the young girl, rather than the very vague some time between 2001 and 2006, and her case would not be dependant upon the testimony of HeB and MS.
 
Last edited:
  • #636
So here is the problem with this reporting. Pisa consistently says that they saw the American woman raped on the video. But we know that is not correct.

Basically I don't trust any of what is in the Daily Fail.
The mirror also reports that MS and HeB talked on the phone.

Under cross examination he admitted talking to co-witness Busching - who will give evidence later in the trial - by phone on Thursday.
 
  • #637
So here is the problem with this reporting. Pisa consistently says that they saw the American woman raped on the video. But we know that is not correct.

Basically I don't trust any of what is in the Daily Fail.
Also here.

Helge B. is also on the witness list in the trial. Manfred S. has been in contact with him to this day. On Thursday, immediately before the third day of the trial, they last spoke on the phone, he claims. In fact, he also phoned on Friday morning, right before the start of the day of the trial, four times with the witness Helge B., as the chamber found. Does that make him unbelievable?

 
  • #638
Also here.

Helge B. is also on the witness list in the trial. Manfred S. has been in contact with him to this day. On Thursday, immediately before the third day of the trial, they last spoke on the phone, he claims. In fact, he also phoned on Friday morning, right before the start of the day of the trial, four times with the witness Helge B., as the chamber found. Does that make him unbelievable?


Great work from those clowns. I always wondered if only one of them saw the video and the other guy was just recounting what he was told, because between them they describe 3 different victims, none of whom is the American
 
  • #639
Great work from those clowns. I always wondered if only one of them saw the video and the other guy was just recounting what he was told, because between them they describe 3 different victims, none of whom is the American
Can they be considered untrustworthy witnesses now even if there is the precedence of the other trial?
 
  • #640
The two rapes without a video or a victim doesn't seem to be the key point in all the trials against CB, even if they might have been in the DM case.

Somehow i tend to think about the possibility, their appearence just might be of strategical reasons. As weak as witness MS seem to appear, as stronger might appear the other witnesses and evidence?!

But yes, MS and HB had been taken as credible witnesses in the past and in relation to trial, with a legally binding sentence.

It looks, as if the prosecutors seem to seperate the wheat from the chaff pretty early, to make it harder more and more for the defence to follow the strategy of questioning the credibility of the witnesses.

I'm still surprised, that this trial started with these two alleged rapes, based on evidence that seems to be questionable, and not with the big "Hazel B. thing"!

Could be a very sophisticated strategy by the court, imho!

We'll see...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
3,167
Total visitors
3,286

Forum statistics

Threads
632,579
Messages
18,628,669
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top