- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
- Messages
- 1,090
- Reaction score
- 3,138
Yes - Hazel is a remarkable person, who is inspiring & has worked tirelessly to support people of sexual crime.Well as it was through some tights it would have been hard to tell whether it was a birthmark or whatever...The fact is she saw it ...talked about it... Got fobbed off with no investigation of the Portuguese police... Talked about it again said she recognised his eyes .. turned out in the recent photos yes he does have a mark on his skin where she said..
I dont give a toss what this Uta says with her it was all a game of oh 20 years ago you described it like this ....or thats not the word you used 20 years ago... A pathetic system where the human gene of knowing is getting thrown out the window for a robotic what I have in paper in front of me...sorry on a computer.. its not just the law .. many workplaces are the same the human touch is gettingon.
The toilet is dirty and needs cleaningyes but your not supposed to do it for another half hour..
Pathetic excuse for a judge who would happily let a known pedophile who has just been described by a specialist to be in the top tier of dangerous men alive walk... Why oh because someone described something a little differently than they did 20 years ago and the computer says no... Pathetic
The trick with these debates is that the shtick will forever be against the victim. I’d like CB inside forever. We will see a feigned appreciation & resolute rhetoric regarding Germany’s strict law about naughty words. The reason they do this is because they can pass off that they were “anti suspect” (because of naughty word trial). It’s because they want to dismiss victims by playing off that they follow the law “either way”. It’s juvenile. Expect that to change in a nanosecond if the appeals are successful or he gets convicted for Mm’s murder.’
Crystal ball works a charm.
