- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,542
- Reaction score
- 71,533
I’m so sorry I forgot to post on the first anniversary of Mollie’s passing I hope Mollie Rests In Peace and justice is done. My thoughts and prayers continue to be with Mollie’s loved ones.
When is he next in court?
Well, technically they should give him some milk and cookies first. I don't have a link though, so JMO."Attorneys Chad and Jennifer Frese argue in a Supplemental Motion to Suppress filed this week that Rivera was not advised of his full rights before the interview. They also argue that Rivera should have been read his rights in his native Spanish, not in English. Attorneys also say that Rivera admitted to being sleep-deprived before the interview and police shouldn't have conducted the interview.
A hearing on the Motion to Suppress is scheduled for August 23rd in Woodbury County where the trial has been moved."
So, if police are investigating the disappearance of a co-ed jogger, and the potential suspect says he is tired, the police have to let him go home and take a nap, instead of being questioned about her whereabouts?
Okay, just getting this straight in my head...they're saying his rights were not read to him in their entirety (in addition to being hours into the interview when they were read to him).Ahead of hearing, attorneys for man accused of killing Mollie Tibbetts further argue that undocumented immigrant's rights were violated
RIP Mollie Tibbetts. I hope for swift justice.
Okay, just getting this straight in my head...they're saying his rights were not read to him in their entirety (in addition to being hours into the interview when they were read to him).
[...]
Defense again argues violation of Miranda rights
"What happened because you are an intelligent person, okay? I am going to read your rights … – Right … okay?” the bilingual police officer interviewing Bahena Rivera said to him, according to a transcript in court records.
“Mm-hmm,” he responded.
“And these rights that — remaining quiet,” the officer continued. “If you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to do it, do you understand?”
“Mm-hmm,” Bahena Rivera said again.
“You have the right to an attorney,” the officer said. “If you can’t pay for one, one will be appointed by the state.”
“Mm-hmm,” Bahena Rivera responded.
“Free of charge," the officer said. “Do you understand what I just told you?”
“Mm-hmm,” Bahena Rivera said.
“Once I have read — have told you this, do you still want to talk to me?” the officer asked.
“Mmm — yes,” Bahena Rivera responded again, according to the defense team’s motion.
Under the long-standing precedent best known as Miranda, individuals must be told they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them in court, and that that they have the right to a present attorney, whether court-appointed or not, prior to questioning — if the interview is to be used as evidence in court.
[...]
I know... But, think about it this way; even if his confession does get tossed, they're going to have a very hard time getting around the home security video, the blood evidence in his vehicle, the fact that he led them to Mollie's remains, etc. MOONo, no, no this can't be....
Ohhhhhh geez...I wasn't thinking...ugh!But his confession included the information about her hidden remains. Would it be 'fruit of the poisoned tree' ---and not be admissible?
Okay, just getting this straight in my head...they're saying his rights were not read to him in their entirety (in addition to being hours into the interview when they were read to him).
[...]
Defense again argues violation of Miranda rights
"What happened because you are an intelligent person, okay? I am going to read your rights … – Right … okay?” the bilingual police officer interviewing Bahena Rivera said to him, according to a transcript in court records.
“Mm-hmm,” he responded.
“And these rights that — remaining quiet,” the officer continued. “If you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to do it, do you understand?”
“Mm-hmm,” Bahena Rivera said again.
“You have the right to an attorney,” the officer said. “If you can’t pay for one, one will be appointed by the state.”
“Mm-hmm,” Bahena Rivera responded.
“Free of charge," the officer said. “Do you understand what I just told you?”
“Mm-hmm,” Bahena Rivera said.
“Once I have read — have told you this, do you still want to talk to me?” the officer asked.
“Mmm — yes,” Bahena Rivera responded again, according to the defense team’s motion.
Under the long-standing precedent best known as Miranda, individuals must be told they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them in court, and that that they have the right to a present attorney, whether court-appointed or not, prior to questioning — if the interview is to be used as evidence in court.
[...]
Hard to believe, but the article says he is a bilingual police officer.Hmmm...so the Spanish translator that told him his rights, left out some of the most important rights. Who was this translator? Was he a cop? It doesn't seem like it because they know this Miranda script backwards and forwards.
Was it a paid translator from a private company? I hope he/she wasn't trying to sabotage the case.
Well, he better study up on his Miranda Rights. That was a major mess up.Hard to believe, but the article says he is a bilingual police officer.