And this is why I tend to doubt she was malingering. She did those kinds “institutional” manipulative actions during the times we saw her. And she was a natural. It seems to me she was incapable of interacting without manipulating, flattering, love bombing, trashing someone not in the room, etc. I am inclined to believe she failed to manipulate while she was incompetent, because the legal system and life in institutions is best “played” with some manipulation, even for ethical people.
The kind of manipulation Lori seemed really good at is often seen in institutional settings like jails and hospitals because- it is a good way to get high on the pecking order and get your needs met.
Lori was so good at it she would thrive in a jail like setting as her former self that i saw. She would be the one with the best bunk, the most friends saving her food, who has a guard who lets her use an office phone, or closes an eye to her contraband. She would, of course, be the one most victimized by being institutionalized. The queen of her block or ward. I can’t see her turning that off and keeping it off to put off a trial, when it was her ordinary way of dealing with the world, where the are other options for getting by than playing such games. There really are not too many other options in institutional settings.
I would think she would be incapable of not being manipulative; therefore I think she would be incapable of malingering. I don’t know how to untwist all those negatives; maybe someone can express this convoluted thought better than I.
That said, I don’t know her, and her victims’ survivors do. I know there are people close to this case who think she is/was malingering, and they have more than body cam and pod cast clips and police interviews for data. So I’m probably wrong. Yet, from what of Lori I know and have seen, Lori is way too manipulative to cease manipulating and getting all of its rewards (which are even greater institutionalized) for long.
IMO