- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 206,092
I believe the claim is that the brothers wore white makeup under their facemasks?
This is absurd
Good grief.
The BS gets thicker, and stinkier each passing day.
I believe the claim is that the brothers wore white makeup under their facemasks?
This is absurd
The only thing that is *clear* about this is that Jussie himself “identified” the Osundairo brothers as “white” men. Wearing MAGA hats. And yelling a phrase intended to slur an entire swath of the population due to a stereotype of political beliefs.
It won’t be long before we have word from the O brothers, or via their attorneys or statements, as to whether they wore “whiteface” beneath their ski masks when they staged the “attack” at Jussie’s direction. IMO. My guess is “no”. That would be smeary all over the mask, right? There would be physical evidence.
I don't think charges can be brought again. I am guessing that the charges were dismissed with prejudice, meaning they cannot be refiled. That would be very unusual. But I bet it happened. But of course, since the file is sealed, we don't get to see.I can think of another case that involved a verbal agreement with the prosecutor:
https://www.litigationandtrial.com/2016/01/articles/attorney/cosby-non-prosecution-agreement/
Smollett is the next Cosby...and this would be a reason for getting rid of Foxx. Different from Cosby some of this went to court, but it seems rather shaky and I wonder if another SA came in, if they could then prosecute Smollett due to the lack of a written plea agreement. Smollett is certainly making the verbal agreement very questionable with him claiming he is innocent and threatening to sue CPD, which doesn't exactly sound like someone who took a plea.
No mincing words here. Love it!
What is interesting about this is something she says right off the bat. She is asked if she is concerned about the new FBI investigation into this matter. And she says no, because they did nothing wrong "on our end." It isn't wrong for a defense attorney to take a sweetheart deal. But it sounds like she knows damn well the prosecutor did something wrong.
I don't think charges can be brought again. I am guessing that the charges were dismissed with prejudice, meaning they cannot be refiled. That would be very unusual. But I bet it happened. But of course, since the file is sealed, we don't get to see.
continuing with my optimism.. is it possible that the feds are going to press charges, and they are the ones that pulled strings to get state charges dropped so that it wouldn't interfere with an upcoming federal case?
Tina Glandian is milking this for all it’s worth. She’s basking in the spotlight that Mark Geragos planned to sun himself under. This is her big break. Her client is innocent, a hero, a role model, gay, black, a celebrity, and a #Victim (insert trademark).
“Intersectionality” as a business plan, lol! She wins!
Charlie De MarVerified account @CharlieDeMar
Mayor Rahm Emanuel says city is in process of calculating the costs associated with Jussie Smollett investigation. Plans on sending a bill to Smollett. Wants memo line to read: “For Hoax” “I’m sorry”. @cbschicago
TODAYVerified account @TODAYshow
“He at this point again has been victimized much more by what’s happened afterwards than what happened that night.” Watch @SavannahGuthrie's full interview with Jussie Smollett's attorney, Tina Glandian.
Video at the link
TODAY on Twitter
Now that's funny.