Inconsistencies in DB's Story

[Gingy]

He also makes more money being married. Who reports the little boy on their taxes?

DB would be on his insurance, no doubt. How did DB and JI pay for the hospital bill and for Lisa's delivery? No clue, but I'll bet it's all being looked into.

True and good point re - taxes.

I'm typing slow tonight but added to my original post...I'll paraphrase since it adds to what you mentioned about Lisa's delivery.

It seems odd to me that he wouldn't have know about LI if DB was on his health insurance.

 

[iamnotagolem]

Just following up on my word....LOL It took me a while to find the timeline. I was wrong in my previous post.

4:30 p.m.
The 10-month-old's mother, Deborah Bradley, and her brother, Phillip Netz, head to a supermarket to buy baby food and boxed wine. A surveillance camera appears to record the couple as they shop at around 4:45 p.m., KCTV5 reports. Samantha Brando, a next-door neighbor who was visiting family's home with her 4-year-old daughter, checks on Baby Lisa in her crib. Jeremy Irwin stays at home with the kids, WPTV notes.

5 p.m.
Deborah Bradley finishes shopping and returns home with her brother, according to WPTV.

5:30 p.m.
Jeremy Irwin leaves to take on a night gig doing electrical work at a nearby Starbucks. Deborah Bradley's brother also departs the home, KCTV5 reports.

6 p.m.
Samantha Brando heads out to purchase more alcohol, according to KCTV5.

6:30 p.m.
Samantha Brando returns and her daughter sees Baby Lisa, according to WPTV. Deborah Bradley puts Baby Lisa in her crib. (The Kansas City Star has Deborah Bradley putting Baby Lisa in her crib at 6:40 p.m. and Samantha Brando returning around 7 p.m.).

source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/03/baby-lisa-timeline_n_1074377.html

Is there anything in this timeline that doesn't match up with any other timeline? I realize this is from huffington post, but it's the only place I found a timeline outlined like this. Nothing in this timeline seemed "different" from any other one I've seen, even if all the sources aren't everyone's favorite. Is there something inaccurate? By inaccurate I mean according to MSM, not inaccurate in that lies were told.

 

[In da Middle]

JMO, I don't like The Huffington Post as a source. I just don't find them very credible and, again, they weren't here covering things first hand. There is nothing like the folks on the ground here. Things look different when you're seeing this here in person.

Wow, I couldn't agree more!

 

[kansascitypi]

MORALITY is your own perception, your own choices. You may see something as BAD but others may not. And if a person does one bad thing, or 2 bad things, does that mean they will do anything? If DB has no morals, do you think she would outright kill someone? Would you say, well no, she wouldnt go that far? Well why not? If she can dispose of her own child and not tell anyone, then who is to say she is not capable of stone cold murder?

It is all in perceptions.

Im fairness, I know a lot of immoral people in my 50 years that probably aren't murderers.

 

[SyraKelly]

I didn't realize that was public info. Since it is, yes. Last conversation I had, it was in her fridge.

UMM-Why are they keeping it?WOW

 

[norest4thewicked]

Megyn Kelly asked her if she was black out drunk. I believe she said yes. But, again, my point was that was not DB's original characterization. I felt she was led into that answer. It sounds like I'm on her side, but I'm not..just being fair. You have to remember the atmosphere of these interviews. In one day, they did interviews with Fox, ABC, NBC, and People magazine. I can't recall if there were others. But there was obviously much more time involved in it than what was being aired.

Yes, they did many interviews and in every one, out of their own mouths came a different story. I guess I should say out of DB's mouth since Jeremy barely spoke.

 

[kansascitypi]

So, would you say that you and DB are friendly?

I would say we had very polite conversations. I would say that since my blog on Dr. Phil, also expressing my thoughts on JVM, the family no longer wishes to talk to me. I still do my own thing on this.

 

[Little Ol Me]

kansascitypi,
Can you say if you learned anything from Megan's phone records pertaining to this case? Just a simple yes or no will suit me? Thanks, if you can reply.

 

[kansascitypi]

UMM-Why are they keeping it?WOW

The LE measured what was left. I'm sure the attorneys thought it was a good idea to keep it.

 

[hambirg]

I didn't realize that was public info. Since it is, yes. Last conversation I had, it was in her fridge.

Why would she still have the box in her fridge? Is it just me, or does anybody else find that really weird? I thought LE took the bag out to measure the remaining wine. So is it just the box?

ETA-ok. . just saw the above posts. . .it is probably the lawyers. I still think it's weird. It couldn't be used as any kind of evidence because it has been in their fridge for 4 months.

 

[vlpate]

Megyn Kelly asked her if she was black out drunk. I believe she said yes. But, again, my point was that was not DB's original characterization. I felt she was led into that answer. It sounds like I'm on her side, but I'm not..just being fair. You have to remember the atmosphere of these interviews. In one day, they did interviews with Fox, ABC, NBC, and People magazine. I can't recall if there were others. But there was obviously much more time involved in it than what was being aired.

She changed her timeline based on the fact that she couldn't remember if she checked on Lisa because she was drunk....these are HER words....not the media's words. This is not even a bone of contention for the members here who think she could be totally innocent of any involvement!

No disrespect, but I can see her personality type trying to pull the wool over a kind hearted person's eyes. She's seen so little kindness since this happened.

 

[kansascitypi]

kansascitypi,
Can you say if you learned anything from Megan's phone records pertaining to this case? Just a simple yes or no will suit me? Thanks, if you can reply.

I can tell you that the 11:57pm phone call from DB's phone never made it to MW's phone, making Dane Greathouse likely irrelevant. Some media outlets keep talking about an 8:30pm phone call. Didn't happen. It should be the 8:30am phone call the next morning and that's when LE called Megan's phone. Dane answered the phone and lied about who he was. I read nothing into that other than Dane's already a shady character.

 

[Sherbie]

She answered "yes" to a simple "were you drunk" question multiple times with multiple interviewers. She surely knows the difference between drunk vs. buzzed and could easily have said, "not drunk, but a little buzzed." It's not a tricky, gotcha, set-up kind of question, but a very straightforward one. I almost feel as if she wants to keep her options open for some reason.

 

[kansascitypi]

Why would she still have the box in her fridge? Is it just me, or does anybody else find that really weird? I thought LE took the bag out to measure the remaining wine. So is it just the box?

ETA-ok. . just saw the above posts. . .it is probably the lawyers. I still think it's weird. It couldn't be used as any kind of evidence because it has been in their fridge for 4 months.

The box isn't in the fridge. It's a container with the remaining wine.

 

[vlpate]

True and good point re - taxes.

I'm typing slow tonight but added to my original post...I'll paraphrase since it adds to what you mentioned about Lisa's delivery.

It seems odd to me that he wouldn't have know about LI if DB was on his health insurance.

Maybe he did know about Lisa - the information that he didn't came from his mother. He'd probably have some 'splainin to do as well.

 

[highflyer]

I didn't realize that was public info. Since it is, yes. Last conversation I had, it was in her fridge.

Bump.

 

[octobermoon]

The box isn't in the fridge. It's a container with the remaining wine.

So they are keeping the wine that was drained and measured by LE?

I am dense today. Wouldn't LE have kept the left over wine?

Sorry to be a PITA

I really don't get what you mean.

 

[iamnotagolem]

The box isn't in the fridge. It's a container with the remaining wine.

I don't understand this at all. So LE measured out how much wine was left, it was put in a different container and DB & JI put that in their fridge and it's still there 4 months later? Is there a reason for this? Is it symbolic for them? I'm just not getting it. Surely if this was some type of "evidence" as to how much DB drank, they could tamper with it and add more wine, pour some out, do whatever they wanted to if they were trying to prove some point. I'm sure LE documented the amount of wine when they measured it. Surely their attorneys could have done the same, taken pics or something besides save it. What if it's another 2 years before they find Lisa's body? Will they keep the wine until she's found? Did they indicate why they were keeping it or for how long they intended to keep it?

Sorry for all the questions, but this is the oddest thing.

 

[kansascitypi]

So they are keeping the wine that was drained and measured by LE?

I am dense today. Wouldn't LE have kept the left over wine?

Sorry to be a PITA

I really don't get what you mean.

LE measured the remaining wine. I assume the attorneys advised DB to keep the remaining wine, just in case it was needed. It's already been measured. Can't tamper.

 

[norest4thewicked]

About the box of wine...seriously does anyone think that they still have an empty box sitting in their refrigerator? Not trying to be snarky, but this just sounds funny to me.