I agree about Amber's stepfather...I don't think he would have ever been free of suspicion if not for Gardner doing it again, getting caught, etc...and although he probably would not have been arrested, he would be the person that most would come to see as guilty...his wife already had.
While LE may have various e-mails etc. that show Terri to be a mean-spirited stepmother, among other things, unless anything from her computer actually details a crime or her google searches include "how to disappear a child" I think most of the computer stuff would act as back-up to what they hoped might be some physical evidence by now. Not sure how it would stand on its own. Terri certainly is her own worst enemy as far as "looking guilty" but in the ways that don't really pass an evidence test.
Not enough evidence to assure a conviction doesn't mean LE doesn't have enough evidence to know "who did it".
Very few DAs would be comfortable going to trial without a body, confession, eye witness or the forensics to help prove their case. But, nonetheless, I think LE has come to the conclusions they've come to from following the evidence.
[/b]
above, respectfully, bbm
They point to one undeniable fact: They lack any physical evidence of Kyron, or physical evidence that links anyone to his disappearance.
Though no physical evidence tied to Kyron's disappearance has been unearthed, searchers have uncovered evidence from unrelated crimes.
"Barring an unexpected evidentiary development," said Norm Frink, Multnomah County chief deputy district attorney, "the investigation is going to continue for months."
I'm not sure how many more ways LE could have put this out there, but just in case some might think it's just Staton saying there is NO EVIDENCE, I will add this comment from the same article:
A grand jury has heard from at least 40 witnesses and continues to meet intermittently.
Sadly, because I would like to know where Kyron is too, if the GJ is still meeting months later and have interviewed that many witnesses and have issued no indictment, I agree with Staton, there is no evidence.
As of this article, that's my position. Frankly, I hope they find some, on someone, somewhere!
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/12/multnomah_county_sheriff_dan_s_2.html
I still don't understand why the many inconsistencies in Terri's behavior doesn't sound an alarm. Terri drove her flashy Red Squirrel to do errands & whatever. This particular day she REQUESTED the white truck in order to bring back Kyron's Project after school & pick up Kyron. She does neither !!! No Kyron, no project. She is expecting them both on the BUS????
I would have found that Hinky...but that's just me:banghead::banghead: However she does have time to take a photo of Kyron beside his project that day & post it on the internet to show he was @ school for how long? The project & Kyron never make it home,because they were not important for the use of the truck.( More for dumping bodies )
Great question. IMO it is the innocent person who needs an attorney more than a guilty one. Especially when it is obvious that you are being considered a "defacto" suspect.
Put yourself for a moment in Terri's shoes, after weeks of questioning and re-questioning by LE, add to that being told she failed three LDT's. (Amber duBois' step-father took 10, do you think it was because LE told him he "passed with flying colors"?)
Although they maintained all along that she was thoroughly cooperating, obviously what she told them, was not what they wanted to hear. No one believed her. If you are telling the truth and no one believes you what would you do?
Enter the MFH accusation, that shows up at your doorstep in a RO from your husband, along with the accusation from your husband that LE gave him probable cause to believe you're responsible for Kyron's disappearance, and your husband takes away your youngest child. What would you do? Would you stand by passively, still telling LE and your family that you had nothing to do with it, while while they are railroading you in tandem? I think not.
I know what I'd do. I'd hire my butt the best attorney I could find. I'd feel I was being persecuted to the hilt at that point and I would say to myself:
"Enough already, they are trying to pin Kyron's disappearance on me. I've told them everything I did that day, and they say it doesn't add up, but it does, it's what I did. Is there some time I can't account for, sure, I wasn't looking at my watch all day. Good grief, if I'd planned this, I'd have made for a much better alibi. What do they think I am, a murderer? Why do they think I'd harm Kyron? They're spending all this time on me and they should be out trying to find the real perp! I'm so pissed off, I'm being railroaded because they have no other leads. I've got to get an attorney, now."
And so she does, and guess what the attorney tells her to do? "Yes, Terri, I think you are right, this is a witch hunt. It's apparent you are the focus "defacto suspect" of LE. They have no other leads, you were the last one to see Kyron alive, they have no where else to turn. Shut the **** up! Say no more, because we cannot defend you until we know what we're defending you against."
And that, is where we stand today. Innocent or guilty, if you are suspect of a crime, defacto or otherwise, you need an attorney. In fact, innocent people need a lawyer more because a jury may not automatically find them innocent. Think about it.
In my opinion, if Terri' is guilty, but especially if she's innocent, the smartest thing she's done so far, is hire an attorney and take his advice. JMO
I agree with you on all points except for one- If Terri is innocent, then why isn't she/hasn't she announced her innocence? I am desperate to hear Terri say that she is innocent (obviously, I don't know her, but you know what I mean). Via her lawyer, via the media, via the internet, via the facebook pages- Even in the early stages, why wasn't she screaming it from the rooftop?
I am innocent! Where is my precious step son? Somebody help us!
I still don't understand why the many inconsistencies in Terri's behavior doesn't sound an alarm. Terri drove her flashy Red Squirrel to do errands & whatever. This particular day she REQUESTED the white truck in order to bring back Kyron's Project after school & pick up Kyron. She does neither !!! No Kyron, no project. She is expecting them both on the BUS????
I would have found that Hinky...but that's just me:banghead::banghead: However she does have time to take a photo of Kyron beside his project that day & post it on the internet to show he was @ school for how long? The project & Kyron never make it home,because they were not important for the use of the truck.( More for dumping bodies )
One thing that has always bothered me is that she did not go to his talent show that afternoon. Am I remembering correctly that Kyron was supposed to take part in the school Talnet Show that day?
Because if so, it is very strange she did not go.
ITA Katydid and no one ever brings it up. I think the truth about that was silenced right away by LE once the media printed Kyron was to perform in it.
I would also bet it was a heavy topic of conversation among the members of LE. eh?
http://www.pps.k12.or.us/schools/skyline/
Even in this year's calendar (2010-2011) it appears the Talent Show is for, primarily, the student body. As I recall, one classmate of Ky's expected Ky to perform with him (her?) in the Talent Show (Okay. Ask me for a link. It'll take me a while ...)
Anyway. The fact TH didn't attend the talent show is ... eh? Yes, TH COULD have attended (if parents were invited) ... and she could have picked up the SF project.
She didn't. She didn't attend the talent show. She didn't pick up Ky's SF project.
That's all we know.
http://www.pps.k12.or.us/schools/skyline/
Even in this year's calendar (2010-2011) it appears the Talent Show is for, primarily, the student body. As I recall, one classmate of Ky's expected Ky to perform with him (her?) in the Talent Show (Okay. Ask me for a link. It'll take me a while ...)
Anyway. The fact TH didn't attend the talent show is ... eh? Yes, TH COULD have attended (if parents were invited) ... and she could have picked up the SF project.
She didn't. She didn't attend the talent show. She didn't pick up Ky's SF project.
That's all we know.
http://www.pps.k12.or.us/schools/skyline/
Even in this year's calendar (2010-2011) it appears the Talent Show is for, primarily, the student body. As I recall, one classmate of Ky's expected Ky to perform with him (her?) in the Talent Show (Okay. Ask me for a link. It'll take me a while ...)
Anyway. The fact TH didn't attend the talent show is ... eh? Yes, TH COULD have attended (if parents were invited) ... and she could have picked up the SF project.
She didn't. She didn't attend the talent show. She didn't pick up Ky's SF project.
That's all we know.