So true. If you don't know the answer to a question, look for the money. It's often foolproof. JMO.
I do keep wondering about Stines' ruminations as he passes each day in custody. Does he waver at all, feeling doubt or regret when revisiting the moment he chose to kill Judge Mullins, or does he bask in relief and righteousness, certain he'll be exonerated? Does he feel safe now?
Such an inexplicable case.
Some people; when confronted with serious situations, review the facts and consider the options either available to them or obtainable. They decide on one as the solution and proceed to implement it. Sometimes it takes a while to sort thru and weed out the impossible, impractical, or ineffective.
But, when a decision is reached, action is taken. At that stage, they have no care for the subject, collateral damage, or their own future. They then "rationalize" the situation as a necessary act fully accomplished.
So there was a reason; started back in the time frame of the deputy's activities, and continued to stress Stines. Probably had nothing to do with that specifically, but he became aware of something.
He reviewed, considered, eliminated some, solidified others. He knew his county, the people in it and their history's/records. He reached conclusions. He must have voiced these to Mullins at some point as noted in the references during their lunch.
I think Sheriff Stines is occupied with helping his attorneys prepare for trial and gives little thought to his actual act. He believed it was necessary, he did it, now to work out the results. JMO..