Hi turaj.
I didn't really notice the head-shaking because I was mostly focused on the person talking. That was very observant of you.
I kind of think that maybe it took a little longer for the red-haired woman who was sitting in the front to, 1. understand and read the directions, and 2. decide. I say this because she said herself that once she "got" the instructions, then she knew what verdict to give. She stated that she read the instructions and actually made other jurors re-read them to her (I guess out loud) so that she could understand them thoroughly, and that she did this until she understood all the directions to her satisfaction. And she also stated that she didn't think there was enough evidence for pre-meditation, but that she thought there was most definitely extreme atrocity and cruelty.
To me, I think it was maybe this issue as well as perhaps some other people also had question re: instructions and difference between M1 and M2.
I think it's great that she wanted to understand the law and understand the directions.
I thought all the jurors seemed very intelligent and very fair. They were adamant that they at first presumed Aaron innocent and that they went by what the instrucitons and law told them to do.
They seemed like a cohesive group one of which was never (IMO) available in the Arias trials (cohesiveness I mean). I don't know if that's credit to the prosecution in their voir dire, or the defense, both, or maybe just luck.
I am so glad Anderson did the interview! So proud of the jurors!