@kuromiiiilove just want to say THANK YOU for posting the courtroom updates…so very helpful for those of us that can’t watch the trial everyday and can occasionally check in to see what’s happening.
AARCA ran tests. The CW didn’t like the results.That’s a good question. I wonder if any of the experts have opined on that.
I’m wondering if the defense ran some tests on that? They’re pretty thorough. Maybe they ran the tests and didn’t like the results?
Don't forget the drive from 34 Fairveiw to 1 Meadow, Karen's driving in the morning then to Dighton and back.
I'd love to see a reenactment of that, please?Alessi is asking how those apparent glass pieces would have ‘rested’ on the bumper after a 30 minute tow. The Lexus had driven to Dighton and then back to Canton.
@kuromiiiilove just want to say THANK YOU for posting the courtroom updates…so very helpful for those of us that can’t watch the trial everyday and can occasionally check in to see what’s happening.
Thank you, I appreciate that!!!@kuromiiiilove just want to say THANK YOU for posting the courtroom updates…so very helpful for those of us that can’t watch the trial everyday and can occasionally check in to see what’s happening.
Haven’t you seen the commercial for Gorilla Snow?People are gonna say it’s from salt on the road and snow because they are apparently adhesives. JMO
Is it better than Elmer’s snow?Haven’t you seen the commercial for Gorilla Snow?
Yes but not better than duct snow. JMOIs it better than Elmer’s snow?
Yes. Elmer’s is for kids. This stuff if for grownups who are trying really hard to stick something together.Is it better than Elmer’s snow?
Like I said, he's systematically showing how shoddy her work was.
The comments… “through the tailgate looking glass”
Could you say more about why it is not relevant?Alessi on par again, cross is confusing and not relevant, he’s doing a great job running out the clock. moo
Running the clock out by turning CW witnesses into defense witnesses. JMOCould you say more about why it is not relevant?
Very nicely and eloquently said @kuromiiiilove ……. and it in no way diminishes the delicate nature of the human condition and relationships. For either party. Or the sad and unfortunate evening that led to JOK death. And while reading the above I also couldn’t help but reflect on what many now know about the defendant KR’s own health conditions. Some things that no one likely would have preferred to have made public. And just cringe that the former investigator in the case had mocked or made fun of those conditions in messages with his former colleagues. While at the same time he was looking for compromising images of the defendant. Instead, perhaps, of real evidence. SMH. MOOExactly this. I’ve had fights with my partner I’d never want played back for all to hear. Karen’s voicemails weren’t composed or rational, they were raw, messy, and human. That’s not indicative of murder. It’s indicative of heartbreak. People say ugly things when they’re spiraling, especially under the weight of betrayal trauma, which hits when someone you love and trust violates that bond. As far as we know, John had likely cheated before, and Karen was reacting to a painful, familiar pattern. That doesn’t excuse the language, but it explains the intensity. Anyone who’s been hurt like that knows how easily it can break you. Emotional volatility isn’t criminal - as I’ve said before, if it was, half the country would be in jail. MOO.