- Joined
- Jan 25, 2024
- Messages
- 2,661
- Reaction score
- 37,575
Ok, we’re back. Burgess is looking at the CV he submitted to the federal court.Alessi is back up.
Between the time Burgess left the witness stand until this moment, has he talked to anyone about this case? Burgess says no.
Has a filing ever been made in any court in which your educational background has been misrepresented? Burgess says ‘not that he’s aware of’ - lol.
Alessi is asking about a case in Texas- Jeffrey & Theresa Glover vs. Graphic Packaging International LLC. In this case, Burgess is no longer participating.
Why is he no longer participating, you may ask?
Because he submitted a CV TO THE FEDERAL COURTS that falsified his degrees. Immediate objection + sidebar when Alessi asks what the education history says on this CV.
Can we end the ‘he didn’t lie to the court’ conversation now? He may not have lied to THIS court, but he is clearly willing to.
Alessi tore Burgess to shreds, went home, poured himself a glass of wine, and found more material to bury the remains with, MOO
Burgess says it’s other at Aperture’s job to establish him as an expert witness. Alessi asks, but you knew what documents they needed, didn’t you? Burgess agrees.
Hank asks for another sidebar/recess (I didn’t hear which one). Can’t get away from this one, Hank!