Thank you for locating and posting. I'm still having issues . Fingers crossed in hopes this reply finally does post.
I provided one so now you know what they do and why they are involved in the case.
I agree. His comments do nothing other than give us insight into his personality and how he expresses his anger. The inconsistencies and lies have made him an unreliable narrator.
I'm curious too. I've searched and searched but the only thing I've seen are Wes' posts here accusing them of misconduct because Franz knows a police officer. As if that's so rare. People who know cops - including friends and family members - are arrested and charged every day. As a veteran I would find it odd if Wes himself didn't have a connection to someone in law enforcement.
Because there is not one shred of proof for that rumour, started by Wes, but there is proof that he has lied about many things.
Petty incidents of men behaving badly.
Right? Start a thread about corruption within the MSP and post links and opinions there. It really has nothing to do with the reason we are reading and posting in this thread.
Though your comment is clear as an opinion. “...the way in which you interpret “Lt. Shaw saying it’s clear he means Ally’s case” is an internal investigation is not defining as I read it.
Yes, the narrative the “ex”-VI began and closed as intended with his initial statement as to “how he found out” supplied the catalyst for future statements he himself voluntarily chose to provide. Often, the words first spoken in an open statement reflect the very basis for speaking to an audience via a strategic ongoing narrative: LE did not cooperate with him. The operative word here is “ex”
