Yes, it reminded me of when someone is being strangled and their legs start thrashing around. After that it looked like Lane kept moving his legs around to see if he could get a response. He didn't. Not for the next three minutes, anyway.And he also tells us of the hypoxic/anoxic/myoclonic seizure (which happens automously due to fatal brains 02 levels/drastically low brain levels this happens) he had at 20:24:22 where GF's legs jumps up.
I had thought previously that Lane had lifted his legs. I had not realized until just now that they "jumped up/stiffened" and Lane actually pushed them back down!
View attachment 291895
Nelson may as well throw up his hands on cross. Dr. Tobin is unflappable, and described exactly what was occurring with poor Mr Floyd down to the spit second.
The fentanyl testimony also is out the window as any part of a defense.
That and the fact he was using his finger and knuckle as a desperate attempt to breathe.That was so hard to watch IMO, knowing now, what exactly was going on for Mr. Floyd![]()
True, Dr. Tobin explained how those last movements of GF fingers were last attempts at life's breathsThat and the fact he was using his finger and knuckle as a desperate attempt to breathe.
Yes, and that scares me- guess I've seen it all too often.You may be right but, I keep thinking he just has to get to one juror for a hung jury.
Yes, and that scares me- guess I've seen it all too often.
Nelson may as well throw up his hands on cross. Dr. Tobin is unflappable, and described exactly what was occurring with poor Mr Floyd down to the spit second.
The fentanyl testimony also is out the window as any part of a defense.
No, I don't think there is any way they would determine his struggling as resistance. Not for nine minutes. They had no reason to use unauthorized excessive force to begin with. Even before they threw him to the ground he was passively resisting. Once he was handcuffed, he was no longer a threat. They are not trained in psychology, but they are trained in crisis intervention and knowing when de-escalation is appropriate and when deadly force is not. They are also warned against the dangers of neck restraints and how to properly monitor the subject. Imo(respectfully snipped by me)
But, could the defense argue that the officers misinterpreted Mr Floyd's struggles to get into a better position for breathing, as resistance?
After all, (IMO) they are trained in detaining (often uncompliant) people, and not in respiratory physiology.
I don't think that intent can be inferred from this (IMO), especially if the officers were not aware of the potential implications of this.
I am presenting another perspective, even though I may (or may not) personally support that.
After all, Graham vs Connor says that the reasonableness of force should be judged based not from the view of a lay person, or a respiratory specialist, but,
"from the perspective of a reasonable officer, on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight."
Graham v. Connor - Wikipedia
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
Too early for me to decide. I want to hear the defense side before chosing anything.At this point, what do you all think the verdict will be based on the EVIDENCE presented thus far (rather than your emotions and initial beliefs before trial)? Remember, that the defense hasn't presented their case.
Guilty of ?
1) Murder 2nd Degree
2) Murder 3rd Degree
3) Manslaughter 2nd Degree
4) Not Guilty on all charges
5) Hung Jury
I would make a poll if I knew how to (and if it's allowed).
No, I don't think there is any way they would determine his struggling as resistance. Not for nine minutes. They had no reason to use unauthorized excessive force to begin with. Even before they threw him to the ground he was passively resisting. Once he was handcuffed, he was no longer a threat. They are not trained in psychology, but they are trained in crisis intervention and knowing when de-escalation is appropriate and when deadly force is not. They are also warned against the dangers of neck restraints and how to properly monitor the subject. Imo