• #2,521
How long will this misinformation continue? This did not happen. The service was over.
The pastor has a voice, if he wanted to continue with his sermon he could have said that and continued. Even in the face of protesting.
A service isn't over just because a sermon has been interrupted by a group of outsiders who have obstructed the church service. There is a lot more to a church service than the sermon. And the Pastor was kept from proceeding to do what he needed to do at that time. No misinformation here, just the facts. Watch the Pastor's face on the video and see him straining and desperately trying to see what is happening with his flock and needing to get to them. Very hard to watch and sad to see.
 
  • #2,522
Flock? Flock of sheep??? People can speak out. They have voices. The children were fine. Lemon blocked no one. Let the scales fall from your eyes. jmo
Are you saying that many able bodied men could not push back? They were so weak that they were scared of Don Lemon?????
are you suggesting the parishioners should have engaged physically with the angry yelling protesters and Lemon?
 
  • #2,523
are you suggesting the parishioners should have engaged physically with the angry yelling protesters and Lemon?
No need. Look at the footage. People could just walk around with no need to engage physically or verbally.

MOO
 
  • #2,524
How long will this misinformation continue? This did not happen. The service was over.
The pastor has a voice, if he wanted to continue with his sermon he could have said that and continued. Even in the face of protesting.
The Service was disrupted by the protesters, and DL participated in that. That is fact, not disinformation.
 
  • #2,525
Flock? Flock of sheep??? People can speak out. They have voices. The children were fine. Lemon blocked no one. Let the scales fall from your eyes. jmo
Are you saying that many able bodied men could not push back? They were so weak that they were scared of Don Lemon?????
So you are saying that the congregation should have used force/violence to remove the protesters, otherwise they don't have a claim? That is an odd position to take.
 
  • #2,526
So you are saying that the congregation should have used force/violence to remove the protesters, otherwise they don't have a claim? That is an odd position to take.
I never said that, but you can use your voice you can do plenty without violence. These are not helpless little lambs. imo
 
  • #2,527
I never said that, but you can use your voice you can do plenty without violence. These are not helpless little lambs. imo
They were there to worship. They are allowed to do so. The invasion of their worship service was a crime. You need to stop victim blaming which is not allowed here.
 
  • #2,528
They were there to worship. They are allowed to do so. The invasion of their worship service was a crime. You need to stop victim blaming which is not allowed here.
I am not victim blaming. I am saying the congregation were not helpless sheep. As I keep reading here. jmo
 
  • #2,529
They were there to worship. They are allowed to do so. The invasion of their worship service was a crime. You need to stop victim blaming which is not allowed here.
What victim blaming? I don’t see any.
 
  • #2,530
ADMIN NOTE:

Tone down the hostilities in this discussion, and do NOT quote things that members never said.
 
  • #2,531
<snipped for focus>

What we know is that the Pastor is a pastor, and the service isn't over until he tends his flock whether they are trying to get out of a horrible situation in their sanctuary, looking for the children, or hunkered down in the pews. He is trying to do that while Lemon was badgering him with his microphone. He needed to continue to do his work which was to try to make sure his congregants were safe, especially the children. That's what we know. And that is part of the service, interrupted or not. And Lemon stood in the way of that.
💯 Agree!! Well said!!
 
  • #2,532
The Service was disrupted by the protesters, and DL participated in that. That is fact, not disinformation.
When and how did Lemon disrupt the service?
 
  • #2,533
  • #2,534
WE can all go round and round about this. The allegation is that the protesters did illegally interfere with the church service. As far as I know, this is not reasonably disputed. What is disputed is whether DL and his associate did as well. The arguments are all well set out. Lets just wait and see what happens.
 
  • #2,535
WE can all go round and round about this. The allegation is that the protesters did illegally interfere with the church service. As far as I know, this is not reasonably disputed. What is disputed is whether DL and his associate did as well. The arguments are all well set out. Lets just wait and see what happens.
So, "never!" it is.

MOO
 
  • #2,536
When and how did Lemon disrupt the service?
Hexe, this evidence has been produced over and over and over and over. We are not going to do this anymore.
 
  • #2,537
Hexe, this evidence has been produced over and over and over and over. We are not going to do this anymore.
I'm sorry, but the evidence has not been presented. The videos simply don't show criminal behavior by Lemon.

Give a time stamp.

MOO
 
  • #2,538
I'm sorry, but the evidence has not been presented. The videos simply don't show criminal behavior by Lemon.

Give a time stamp.

MOO
The evidence is clear, it is in DL videos, the statements of the church members. It has all been "presented." That you reject it, is fine. But that is your opinion. You can't just keep stating over and over and over and over that nothing is presented. It has been.
 
  • #2,539
I'm sorry, but the evidence has not been presented. The videos simply don't show criminal behavior by Lemon.

Give a time stamp.

MOO
As far as I'm aware, the general public has not seen all the evidence mentioned in the charging docs.
I look forward to that evidence being made available.

jmo
 
  • #2,540
As far as I'm aware, the general public has not seen all the evidence mentioned in the charging docs.
I look forward to that evidence being made available.

jmo
If I recall, the church has cameras that videotape and/or stream services, am I remembering that correctly? If so I look forward to seeing any footage that the prosecution plans to use to support their case against Lemon and the protesters.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
174
Guests online
2,584
Total visitors
2,758

Forum statistics

Threads
646,021
Messages
18,852,730
Members
245,867
Latest member
James_1990
Top