Muffet
Autocorrect is my worst enema
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,053
- Reaction score
- 9
What bothers me is, whether she passed or failed the poly is moot but -- afterwards she shared new info on a dream with a party and maybe 4 people. It seems everytime there is some new info that should be aggressively pursued.
RC sticks with the original set of inconsistencies but there are new ones. Is MC trying to deflect or is this her way of spilling some 'half truths'? She cannot tell the truth or cannot recall but the story is evolving and, to me, that needs to be explored to see what comes of it.
Lacks focus on the fundamentals, a solid story and, timeline ..... just like the A's. A story should not change if it is a true experience and recounting.
Good points, cyberborg. For me, it's a matter of asking myself, with which possibility is the behavior that we observe most consistent? What choice leaves me with the least need to rationalize?
To my mind, hypothesizing that he is directly guilty or simply guilty of covering something up, I find nothing I need to contort my way around to explain. His behavior is pretty much what I would expect it to be, if that hypothesis is true.
On the other hand, under the hypothesis that he is utterly in the dark, innocent, and sincerely trusts Misty, I'm left with too many inconsistencies requiring rationalizations and reaches for explanations.
It's like threading a screw in crooked. It can be done, but it takes more effort than it should and keeps going off track. If I kept forcing it, it would be easier, but only because I had stripped the threads that gave me the feedback I needed to be sound.