• #23,501
  • #23,502
I did think about this, but the issue is that wallet is now forever tainted. It will be monitored and each withdrawal/transfer will be closely scrutinized for the rest of your life.

One would theoretically want to move everything out of the wallet as quickly as possible to somewhere as secure and anonymous as possible. That’s where the big issues come in.

When a new bitcoin wallet is made, it has no prior history. So there would be no rush to move funds out of it. Yes, that address will be watched like a hawk and is forever tainted. But still, that address is all they "know" about the perp.

The perp's next move would be to start swapping bitcoin to monero. That ends the chain of records right there, and would make blockchain analysts' lives very hard.
 
  • #23,504
I think the FBI will be able to figure out each item and accessory the mask guy is wearing from head to toe including what I think are at least two hyper-realistic face masks (female top, male bottom, somehow being worn together) under the ski mask. But I don't know if they can easily enough track purchases for what are not rare items. But it's quite a bit of evidence still.
 
  • #23,505
I think it's from a different time period. The FBI said it was of "the individual." So it must have been before and not after, because he disabled the camera before the crime.
Sorry if I'm being thick, but has this been analyzed on here? Trying to keep up. I think that has major relevance if the case - so he had the backpack/gun at one point in time on the front porch and then in another point in time did not? I can't even start to know why that's the case but it seems like it would be relevant. Did he leave the backpack and gun inside? In the getaway car? Why did he take them off?

I am beginning to think this was never a kidnapping. The person on camera was hired to clean up the crime scene and perhaps dispose of the body, and Nancy was murdered before his arrival. I won’t speculate on the murderer, though. I think we all have our thoughts, and that is enough. Still doesn’t explain the Apple Watch sync, if it happened earlier in the night, though. The kidnapping theory has just gotten weird and is going in too many insane directions.
I sort of thought that before, but I think that would be too risky for the original perp - bringing in a third party/more people which is risky if they are caught or if they give away the crime for a plea deal, etc. I mean it's still possible, it just doesn't seem smart
 
  • #23,506
True. But, IMO there are cases where the perp was deemed mentally ill/psychotic, but still carried out a planned a targeted attack (like Holmes, the theater killer, for instance).
I also want to note that individuals with mental illnesses are much more likely to be victims of violent crime than perpetrators of violent crime.
 
  • #23,507
That's the part I've been thinking of since I heard it. Since an inside job has not been ruled out by LE officially (or has it? Correct me if I am wrong here). But the what if. What is someone DOES or SHOULD recognize the person, but says the don't? That would mean horrific things.
How can LE rule out an inside job when they have no clue who took her??
 
  • #23,508
Has anyone considered or noticed if NG had a roof-mounted satellite dish or terminal such as (Star Link or Hughesnet) for her Wi-Fi?
 
  • #23,509
Sorry if I'm being thick, but has this been analyzed on here? Trying to keep up. I think that has major relevance if the case - so he had the backpack/gun at one point in time on the front porch and then in another point in time did not? I can't even start to know why that's the case but it seems like it would be relevant. Did he leave the backpack and gun inside? In the getaway car? Why did he take them off?


I sort of thought that before, but I think that would be too risky for the original perp - bringing in a third party/more people which is risky if they are caught or if they give away the crime for a plea deal, etc. I mean it's still possible, it just doesn't seem smart
John Wick does it all the time.
 
  • #23,510
Good night to all you wonderful internet friends here. Praying for Nancy to return to her family and for justice for this entire situation! Hopefully a good night's rest for us and for people working this case for LE will bring a fresh perspective and leads.
I can't even begin to catch up on the posts today lol. If someone who has been keeping up could post a daily recap that'd be amazing!
Jmho
 
  • #23,511
What if this guy just grabbed gloves from his doctors or dentists' office? There are boxes of them everywhere in medical offices.

Or, at a restaurant, if he works in one? When I worked in a restaurant we had a storage basement with no cameras and would go down there all the time to get stuff. No one would notice if I took one pair (or one box, for that matter) of the many boxes of gloves.

The backpack is from one of the largest retailers in the US. He could have had it for 15 years. He could have grabbed it from a lost and found bin at his kid's school or at a gym. Or ordered it online using his girlfriend's credit card and had it shipped to a different address.

I just am highly skeptical that the clothing/gloves/bag, which are all incredibly generic, will lead to an ID. Not to criticize those looking into those things! I'm glad people are and it would seem irresponsible for LE not to. I just think if I were to commit a crime I wouldn't go into my local Walmart to buy all the supplies (in this case, clothing/backpack/gloves - not like crime clean up chemicals or zip ties or something) a few weeks before... MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #23,512
  • #23,513
Sorry if I'm being thick, but has this been analyzed on here? Trying to keep up. I think that has major relevance if the case - so he had the backpack/gun at one point in time on the front porch and then in another point in time did not? I can't even start to know why that's the case but it seems like it would be relevant. Did he leave the backpack and gun inside? In the getaway car? Why did he take them off?


I sort of thought that before, but I think that would be too risky for the original perp - bringing in a third party/more people which is risky if they are caught or if they give away the crime for a plea deal, etc. I mean it's still possible, it just doesn't seem smart
Yeah I definitely agree, very risky. The reward would have to heavily outweigh the risk, which doesn't track and highly doubtful.
 
  • #23,514
That man has been released. Catch up!

I am worried that with all of the attention on this case, more innocent people will be arrested.

There is so much attention and manpower being spent on the case.
 
  • #23,515
Which leaves me wondering if NG did any volunteer work or befriended a young man in the neighborhood who was challenged.
I'm wondering if there's someone like that in the family. I've been thinking of the Reiner situation. The young adult with problems. That person on the porch acts like he belongs there. I also think they might be intoxicated on some kind of downer. Maybe they've been accustomed to family bailing them out. Maybe they think, or know, that NG keeps pain killers or cash in that house.

Whoever that is took great pains not to be recognized on camera or by NG if she woke up. Things went sideways. Did they call somebody for help? Did a car leave AG/TGs house in the middle of the night? Or did they call a friend? Someone else in the extended family? I don't think whoever is on that porch had the wherewithal to remove a body from the house and secret it away somewhere. Not alone. IMO
 
  • #23,516
I also want to note that individuals with mental illnesses are much more likely to be victims of violent crime than perpetrators of violent crime.
Agreed.
 
  • #23,517
What if this guy just grabbed gloves from his doctors or dentists' office? There are boxes of them everywhere in medical offices.

Or, at a restaurant, if he works in one? When I worked in a restaurant we had a storage basement with no cameras and would go down there all the time to get stuff. No one would notice if I took one box (or one pair, for that matter) of the many boxes of gloves.

The backpack is from one of the largest retailers in the US. He could have had it for 15 years.

I just am highly skeptical that the clothing/gloves/bag, which are all incredibly generic, will lead to an ID. Not to criticize those looking into those things! I'm glad people are and it would seem irresponsible for LE not to. I just think if I were to commit a crime I wouldn't go into my local Walmart to buy all the supplies a few weeks before... MOO
That's how a lot of people get caught. Either Walmart or Home Depo!
 
  • #23,518
I am worried that with all of the attention on this case, more innocent people will be arrested.

There is so much attention and manpower being spent on the case.
I’m worried that the perp is now terrified of the very real possibility of being identified and will do something rash. Then make a break for the border
 
  • #23,519
The way they usually rule out suspects, I suppose...JMO
Well, given that they’ve already detained the wrong suspect, I don’t think skepticism is out of line..
 
  • #23,520
In regards to the "Face" of masked man:

Does anyone see them 'blink' in any of the videos?

Does anyone else see the mouth in the exactly same position (lips slightly parted) throughout different shots, like a frozen face?

Does anyone notice the 'brows' go all the way flat towards the center of the nose, not normally arching?

I need to watch it again, but these are some reasons why I suspect it's a mask and not a real face.
 
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
3,231
Total visitors
3,399

Forum statistics

Threads
644,398
Messages
18,816,532
Members
245,351
Latest member
COLDANDMISSINGCANADA
Top