- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Messages
- 604
- Reaction score
- 5,765
Hi All, this is my first time posting here so apologies in advance if I mess up. Not sure if this topic is okay to share but wanted to discuss the clues I see that indicate a possible motive.
I think the motive for the abduction of NG is indicated by the placement of the holstered gun over the groin of the perpetrator as per the released NEST doorbell camera footage.
The placement of the holstered weapon is deliberate and overt, meant to draw the attention of the intended viewer to the genital area. It could indicate that the perpetrator equates the weapon with his sexual potency and possibly fetishizes sexual violence.
The perpetrator also had no hesitation in performing an act of violence on NG to force submission prior to exiting the residence as indicated by the trail of her blood on the front porch. He could have compelled NG, an 84 year old mobility challenged person, to leave with him without resorting to violence and yet violence was the action of first resort.
Lastly, the perpetrator did not take any of NG's personal possessions which would increase her levels of comfort (such as glasses or hearing aid) or ensure her health conditions were treated (medications). This indicates that the perpetrator had no interest in NG's comfort or concern for her health. If the objective was to seek ransom for NG's safe return, the perpetrator would be taking the medications essential for her survival.
As such, I don't think that the perpetrator abducted NG for ransom and fear that he had no intention of NG surviving their encounter.
MOO
Further along those lines, the Sheriff called in homicide virtually immediately upon visiting the home and declared it a crime scene, so something there indicated that an act was done that could potentially be fatal. A missing 84 year old in and of itself isn't enough to arrive at that assumption. Blood drops on the sidewalk isn't enough to draw that conclusion. The Sheriff almost certainly saw a lot more blood inside the home, perhaps even enough to presume that someone couldn't have survived whatever had occurred.
I don't know if she had a dog inside the home - that has been much discussed and at times even derided by well meaning folks - but if she did have one it was probably killed quickly and that could've caused the Sheriff to conclude that if someone would do that and take a victim with them, then it would likely have been to dispose of her body.
JMO.