bold comments by.<modsnip: Quoted post was remove>
Are we too harsh on AG and TC? We have no proof that they are involved.
After all, we might be looking at a very different situation.
Two children, both successful, have demanding lives and careers far away.
The third one lives next to the mom (who owned her house since when? Long, long ago). They are not wealthy. But the daily
needs of the mother are met by them.
I guess everyone knows that Nancy's nest camera had no subscription.
![]()
The alarming reason footage of Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance can’t be recovered despite security cameras
The 84-year-old was reported missing on Sunday afternoon after she didn’t attend church.pagesix.com
The subscription is cheap. So it tells me that Nancy was living frugally as old people do.
So what if AG and TC were good people who didn't bother anyone with their mom's needs? And nothing more than that?
And maybe a mother who is retired and a daughter who is a poet and her hubby who is an elementary school teacher are in a bad spot just because they took it upon themselves to meet all mom's daily needs?
I am not prepared to suspect them unless I have better proof.
i agree with you that she was probably living frugally (IMO) but part of that is because IMO she is not wealthy like people keep alluding to being a reason for her abduction.
we don't know that they took care of her. the only thing i've seen is she has people come in to help (assuming gardeners, house cleaners, pool person). my sister lived minutes away from my parents (I'm across the country) and she rarely if ever was around to do things for them. when i would ask my mom if sis helped with this or that it was always "she's busy". so i'm not giving a blanket "they took care of all mom's daily needs to them" without verification.
BUT i'm not in the camp that either of them had anything to do with NG's abduction and i feel really bad what this is doing for him/them.