- Joined
- May 17, 2009
- Messages
- 36,098
- Reaction score
- 343,549
Thanks for bringing this up again, straight from the top Mod’s ruling.Direct quote from Tricia
Let me address this.
There is nothing normal about this case. The son-in-law may have been the last person to see Nancy alive. The sheriff has not cleared anyone, and he has also stated there are no “prime suspects” at this time.
Because no one has been cleared, discussion is allowed. However, it must be done using initials only.
The reason is simple. If someone is discussed as a possible suspect and their full name is repeated over and over, it follows them forever. Google does not forget. Using initials helps protect innocent people from long-term harm if they are ultimately not involved.
This situation is unprecedented for Websleuths. We are dealing with a kidnapping in which a family member was reportedly the last person to see Nancy. Shutting down the discussion of the people closest to Nancy and those who last saw her would effectively end the thread.
We are doing the best we can to balance open discussion with protecting innocent people. It is not a perfect system, but ultimately, we are a true-crime discussion forum, and when law enforcement has not cleared anyone and has not named a prime suspect, discussion must be allowed—carefully and responsibly.
Tricia
Nancy had such a small circle. It’s certainly possible someone unconnected to her perpetrated this crime.
I haven’t followed closely but wondered about house keepers, landscapers or others who provided services at the home. They would know a bit about her schedule.