- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 13,063
- Reaction score
- 170,853
Lol these reporters zooming in for clues on a luggage tag
Its still very good info to have!!Traced to Walmart meaning Walmart sells them. Not traced in the sense they have a person who bought those items in the Tucson store.![]()
Same here. My 18 year old high school senior son is still at home. And I have a German shepherd mix dog that alerts me to anything unusual around my house. I will probably get cameras after my son goes to college. I honestly could never make up my mind about a camera, live on a dead end street with neighbors who are attentive and have cameras. But when I do decide to get cameras, I will be getting the subscriptionI’ve lived in 2 states, many homes and have never had a system or a camera currently either
Old and live alone now, still don’t
Any oneWhich Tucson Walmart?
It's just that Walmart carries them.is it verified these items were bought at the walmart? Or is it just that Walmart carries them? The DM article is paywalled.
There's a closer view of the blue shirt on . THIS VIDEO IS FROM FEB 10 AND IS NOT NEW.Does anyone know what happened to that blue shirt crumpled up on a rock on the side of NG’s front walk? Photo from AZcentral.com
Absolutely! And they will run down this lead.Its still very good info to have!!
TMZ released the video, not law enforcement. They blurred the face to protect themselves from litigation if it turns out to be unrelated.
I’m sure it’s been forwarded to law enforcement.
The self-checkout cameras are incredibly unforgiving. Another reason to never commit a crime beyond the very obvious ones... risk of those photos being released to the public...! (all IMO and just a lighthearted joke about how I look in the self-checkout cameras)The security cameras at Walmart will have a good picture of whoever bought the items, so even a cash purchase will yield major evidence. If he used self checkout, even better. Those cameras are practically up your nostrils when they're recording.
Right?!I dunno, I made time this morning for laundry, dishes, and a meal before checking the site and now I have no clue what's happening. Breaks are dangerous.![]()
Perhaps worth mentioning: In each case, LE interviews dozens, even hundreds of people. When the case is finally solved, the culprit's name is frequently found among those interviewed in the early days of the investigation, as I recall. AI compiled this list:From what I understand, a person can only be held for questioning for a short time without grounds for arrest unless there are extenuating circumstances. I believe they stopped this guy because they thought he was about to cross the boarder, not because they had some basis for arrest.
Next level, in AZ a person can only be held under arrest without charges for 48 hrs.
Not sure about the blue shirt.There's a closer view of the blue shirt on
I asked many pages ago if this had ever been mentioned, but haven't seen it anywhere. Not sure it means anything. Just weird how everything else has been analyzed to extreme, but this was there early and got no attention. But it may have zero significance.
I'm so confused about he video that TMZ just released. Where is that at. Is that the night of the kidnapping? Is that Nancy's garage? Or where?
thank you. so just some DM click bait.Traced to Walmart meaning Walmart sells them. Not traced in the sense they have a person who bought those items in the Tucson store.![]()
Then why does it say Tucson Walmart? I can't see the articleTraced to Walmart meaning Walmart sells them. Not traced in the sense they have a person who bought those items in the Tucson store.![]()
This may have been shared already, tent going up outside her front door/porch area.
View attachment 644214
They blurred the face but if you watch the original video without the blur it definitely looks like he is also wearing a mask. Very strange if unrelated.TMZ released the video, not law enforcement. They blurred the face to protect themselves from litigation if it turns out to be unrelated.
I’m sure it’s been forwarded to law enforcement.
No. The DM article just points out they are available at Walmart. Excerpt:Yes, can someone who can read the DM article please elaborate on the Walmart claim? Do we really know it is from a specific Walmart at a specific time, etc.?
This is was a good interview. Re: his statements about Nanos' character, I couldn't help but wonder how much, if any, was inspired by interpersonal hostility. I got the sense (opinion!) that the retired officer never liked the guy. So it made me question any demarcation between "emotional" and "likely".Brian Entin interviewed a retired Sheriff’s Dept officer. He felt the case has been botched from the beginning and blamed the Sheriff’s huge ego. He said the Sheriff would not relinquish much of the investigation to the FBI; the Sheriff’s investigators have only been hired in the last few years and limited expertise; stated it was laughable that the Sheriff rushed out to Rio Rico to be out front if they made an arrest of the Door Dash guy - said Sheriff should remain in the office to coordinate the investigation, etc. Obviously the retired officer had nothing good to say about Sheriff Nanos.
I'm thinking it wasn't a homeless person. The guy on Nancy's porch looked well nourished and the clothes, mask and bag didn't look like they had any wear and tear. I think the videos are unrelated.This video, and another showing a guy trying car doors, are visually very compelling.
But why would a probably homeless guy suddenly decide to break into a house, and after encountering a mobility challenged 84 year old woman, decide to take her. And how in the world would he take her? I doubt he had a car with him.