- Joined
- Nov 21, 2022
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 233
Familial DNA via public databases can narrow pools of suspects.Unless they have suspect in mind and the perp's not a repeat offender, sadly, DNA on the gloves could go nowhere, right? Think JBR.
Familial DNA via public databases can narrow pools of suspects.Unless they have suspect in mind and the perp's not a repeat offender, sadly, DNA on the gloves could go nowhere, right? Think JBR.
Ahhh. Of course. I didn't read that far in the post, sorry!You are reading that name correctly! However, as mentioned at the end of my post, I think one likely possibility is that it was someone using a VPN (IMO / MOO)
Yes, I know about the geneology advances. At least they could get some characteristics--narrow down hair color, eye color, etc. that way. Just not an exact science, unless they have the data from closer family members.Familial DNA via public databases can narrow pools of suspects.
Agree. Showing lack of competence with both FBI and Sheriff department. Could it have been planted later? MOOAs much as Nanos is getting flack, this discovery doesn't look too good for the FBI either. To miss such an important piece of evidence speaks to incompetence across the board.
My guess is NG had a box of similar gloves in her house for gardening, dishes, whatever, and LE wants to see if those gloves match the ones found discarded by the road. IMOGloves inside the home on Day 12. I just don't get it. Someone please help me.
A la Brian Kohberger.They can maybe do genetic genealogy to find out close relatives, leading to perp.
JMO
Glad to see this- I think everyone is inflating this. Obviously we can't see what's happening on the inside and as a public we feel this entitlement to know everything. Our frustration is pointed at LE as naturally people want to find the hold up. If anyone's been in enlisted in the military it's very easy to understand the thinking of an everyday agent to think leadership is slow or redundant. But reality is not every soldier (agent in this case) may know how it's working at the top of the chain.
Would people generally consider her particularly polarizing or so controversial that this would be the case? I’m not particularly that familiar with her.I agree with you. When I first got the news alert about Nancy having gone missing, the first thing I thought was that someone had taken her to get at SG. That thought hasn’t changed.
After all the media attention and detaining the wrong man, agents wandering aimlesslessly in the yard, pizza guy going unnoticed, taking luminol photos a week in, and NY Post of all outlets finds gloves on the side of the road, LE goes and locates her gardening gloves in the home. A pair of gloves. Hmmm...... Pure speculation on my part, JMOMy guess is NG had a box of similar gloves in her house for gardening, dishes, whatever, and LE wants to see if those gloves match the ones found discarded by the road. IMO
Thanks for the info on flock cameras. The image in the story looked very good to me. LE could recognize the car.I'm familiar with Flock cameras, but I am still curious about traffic cameras that don't record, as was stated in the Tweet.
Yes. The gloves would have to come off for certain tasks. So where do the gloves go during a crime? Stuffed into a jacket pocket or thrown on the floor if in a hurry? Set down somewhere with the intention of picking them up later?I can imagine that if he had to do anything requiring dexterity, at least the outer glove layer would need to come off. Tying rope, using tape, brandishing a firearm, etc.
It could have a number of reasons IMO.
SG is also a lawyer and maybe she simply doesn't value the notes to be real.
The FBI could have advised against it with some sort of logical explanation.
The fam wants some proof before paying.
Maybe the ransom notes as we know them has been taken out of context and contain not much info to go on, nothing valuable for the fam. The notes never went public.
They said they will pay but i can imagine first wanting to have some sort of evidence they are communicating with the right person(s).
I really have no clue, it's all just IMO![]()
I don't think of her as controversial either, but she DID grill DJT years ago in a tense exchange...Would people generally consider her particularly polarizing or so controversial that this would be the case? I’m not particularly that familiar with her.
This is a very plausible theory.I agree with you. When I first got the news alert about Nancy having gone missing, the first thing I thought was that someone had taken her to get at SG. That thought hasn’t changed.
Yes there seems to be issues with him and local LE- ITA. The FBI is also having publicized issues and recent controversies regarding issues with prioritized investigations and their Director's competency has been questioned. Imo both teams are making mistakes and behaving poorly, from what I can see here, and that is compounding things further.Nanos is an elected official. He's more like a politician than a general.
He's had multiple investigations prior to this case.
1. During his last election, where members of his own political party called for his resignation, and a Pima County board launched an investigation
2. During 2016, the FBI investigated the Pima County Sheriff's Department regarding corruption and the misuse of federal funds. Local outlets reported that Nanos has held a grudge against the Feds over that.
His background prior to this case is important context.
With all the people voluntarily submitting DNA to know more about their heritage, there may be family members who will match.True. If they find DNA but there's no match in the database, it remains unknown. Let's hope not.