katiecoolady
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 9,177
- Reaction score
- 2,513
Snort! I bet you might have just some kind of remedy in your hip pocket eh?adnoid said:...
Not the kind she needs.

Snort! I bet you might have just some kind of remedy in your hip pocket eh?adnoid said:...
Not the kind she needs.
"administered"adnoid said:The help she needs is best administered in a professional setting.
I agree with you on Ann Bird, she's better off without Jackie.katiecoolady said:Well, in the case of Ann Bird, I think it was a blessing she got distance from that freaked out family. She has a good family. Jackie would always and continually be a disappointment to her. If not downright abusive. IMO. I don't feel she will suffer at all (in the long run) getting disconnected from that dynamic.
Ann's is much more complex. She has two brothers (besides MP) and nieces and nephews she's grown up with, spent holidays with, her own child being connected to etc. her entire life. It really is in the wake of this sociopathic bomb going off in the center of her family that has caused all of the destruction. She has had a very close relationship with entire family before that. I hope it heals in the future but save Michael Peterson admitting he did it and her family validating her position, there will be big gaps. She made it clear that no one treats her with disdain really...just total distance. I think they know she knows far more than she's said and wouldn't want to trigger an avalanche (not that she would do that but still...).
It really is in the wake of this sociopathic bomb going off in the center of her family that has caused all of the destruction.] Quote.]
Wow! That's heavy
Do you have any links on this recent stuff Gozgals , I would love to read them Thanks.Gozgals said:Thank you Katiecoolady for this article. What a great picture too!![]()
![]()
Just the other day I pulled up recent articles on the "Other Michael" and was
reading about him. Glad to see his sister speak out.
You did a wonderful job. I look forward to reading your future peices. I know I will be getting this magazine, just to read your work.
Thank you again.
Gozgals.
Here is one great link for you guys on this case--granted totally Guilty perspective but some of the greatest writing and compilation you will find anywhere. May I introduce my online friend Vance Holmes (aka Poetic Justice):redeskimo said:Do you have any links on this recent stuff Gozgals , I would love to read them Thanks.
Thanks again Katie.katiecoolady said:Here is one great link for you guys on this case--granted totally Guilty perspective but some of the greatest writing and compilation you will find anywhere. May I introduce my online friend Vance Holmes (aka Poetic Justice):
www.vanceholmes.com/court/trial_m_peterson.html
Enjoy!
I agree noorbe. It was actually the author of that book, Diane Fanning, who hooked Ann Christensen up with me. She's a very cool lady herself. I started reading her book Through the Window but honestly got so spooked I had to set it down. She had alot of access to that serial killer in prison. I intend to follow her writing career ...she's working on a new one (trial) now.noorbe said:Thanks again Katie.
I did read the book: Written in Blood.
It was excellent.
Yes, Ann quoted her brother Bill as he was explaining the strength of the DA's case (while attempting to manipulate her to agree to releasing 350K of their father's estate...along with several other strong pieces of evidence against Peterson, which, ironically became the straw for Ann...that which cracked open her mind to realize his guilt). He said that Mike had been nearly exclusively homosexual. That was the first I'd ever heard of that. I suppose it reflected the degree of male on malenanandjim said:Didn't the article say that Michael was almost exclusively homosexual recently? If I read it correctly, this is confusing. Wouldn't Kathleen have wondered why her husband was acting different or perhaps giving her the brush-off.
Could Kathleen have said a snide remark that angered Michael enough to strike out at her?
Now that I think about it, your conclusion makes perfect sense. I mean, what are the odds that Kathleen would be "suddenly" killed in the exact same manner that this other woman died. Too coincidental for my taste...katiecoolady said:...Many people think she foundon his computer that night which caused her to confront him and he lashed out...I think I'm in the minority who believes this was a very carefully crafted attack...
I think his going out to rent the movie "America's Sweethearts" was part of his preplanning and staging. HE kept bringing this up as if it had significance. Like others would buy the "look at how soulmated we were" line of BS. Who remembers the TITLE of a movie they rented the night their loved one is killed or even thinks to mention it...maybe that they were watching a rental movie earlier in the evening sure..but to go on and on about the title? Even his creepy lawyer kept using that as if it had some kind of meaning. That alwayst to me was a clue.nanandjim said:Now that I think about it, your conclusion makes perfect sense. I mean, what are the odds that Kathleen would be "suddenly" killed in the exact same manner that this other woman died. Too coincidental for my taste...
Could it be possible that he even "planned" for Kathleen to find the? If they were in debt and his meal ticket was in danger of losing her job, he may have thought that she was worth more dead than she was alive (due to the large insurance policy). As other killers, he may have thought that he got away with it once. So, he could get away with it again.
Great link . Thanks a millionkatiecoolady said:Here is one great link for you guys on this case--granted totally Guilty perspective but some of the greatest writing and compilation you will find anywhere. May I introduce my online friend Vance Holmes (aka Poetic Justice):
www.vanceholmes.com/court/trial_m_peterson.html
Enjoy!
Is Michael in the general population? I certainly hope so. Also, was he allowed to use any of Kathleen's money for his defense?? I hope not!! How was her estate distributed?katiecoolady said:...Ann's words in her story about him needing to be contained are very very accurate. She knows her brother better than most people...certainly better than those he wanted to buy into his innocence.
katiecoolady said:Here is more debunking the Maha Mockumentary on this case called The Staircase:
www.peterson-staircase.com
katiecoolady said:
I just read this LaMer www.wral.com/peterson/index.html it's down at the bottom of the piece titled A year after the verdict life goes on for people in the Mike Peterson trial . It say's that Germany has opened an investigation .LaMer said:KUDOS Katie, great article. Thank you for bringing Ann's voice to us and being there for Ann. This is one case, I will never forget.
Katie, do you happen to know if the German government has reopened the investigation for the death of Liz?
I don't think it is being considered "reopened" officially. I'm doing a bit of investigating in to that right now. I know Liz's sisters are interested in seeing him prosecuted for her murder. But that is very very delicate considering Liz's daughters who's entire reality is structured that Michael Peterson "saved" them vs. murdered their mother in order to procure them and their incomes. (the latter I obviously believe completely).LaMer said:KUDOS Katie, great article. Thank you for bringing Ann's voice to us and being there for Ann. This is one case, I will never forget.
Katie, do you happen to know if the German government has reopened the investigation for the death of Liz?