- Joined
- Jan 26, 2018
- Messages
- 4,078
- Reaction score
- 40,468
IMO, I agree he was 'targeted' because he appeared scary and intimidating; and quite possibly beyond reason.Not for a minute do I believe that any city in the US thinks killing the homeless or mentally ill is ever a "choice." Our city, state and federal governments (taxpayer funded) have spent billions of dollars trying to protect the homeless, especially if they are military veterans suffering with PTSD. Our Veteran's Affairs dept. has expanded programs to address their medical needs, including mental health and provided housing. None of that has any relevance to this case, imo.
Penny and other witnesses reacted to JN's aggressive and threatening behavior raged directly at them. They had no way of knowing the cause of it nor did it matter. They followed common practices in the US so that JN couldn't hurt himself or them: several called 911, notified the conductor, adult men moved in to restrain JN until police arrived.
It is unfortunate that JN died in the process but not for a second do I believe the rhetoric that JN was "targeted" because of his race, mental illness or homelessness.
JMO
I mean, how long has 'angry yelling man doffs jacket' been pop-culture language/cliché for “this man is ready to throw down'?