I haven't been part of WS long, but I have followed a few cases and actually went back and started reading other cases from thread one. One of the complaints that is almost universally voiced in all those cases is that LE isn't forthcoming enough with information. In my estimation, sometimes it's warranted. However, it's not unique to Kortne's case. Holly Bobo's case comes immediately to mind. Ultimately, especially in cases where there is little information being provided, the complaints turn into suspicion of coverups and involvement by LE. I would suspect such accusations turn out to be true .01% of the time.
Regarding the officer's name, I would want to know that information more to determine if LE negligently carried out their duties, not because I think they were involved in Kortne's disappearance.
My opinion also is no one is hiding that name. LE owes you, me, the public at large nothing in terms of information. It is an active investigation and they will release what they deem is appropriate when they deem it is appropriate. Their refusal to do so doesn't mean there is anything untoward in their actions. It only means I will continue beating my head against the computer wishing I had more information.
Regarding LE involvement in this case...I hope I'm not wrong but I just don't see it. A name not being disclosed doesn't equate to involvement. Just my opinion and I hope I am right because there is nothing scarier than those we trust with protecting our safety, violating that trust if I am wrong.