Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/01/14 In recess

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grrr... this "newest" version of dismiss the DP by Nurmi sure is a puzzler as written.

To say that the lack of secret testiphoney will make it impossible for the prosecution to pursue the DP? Come on! Nurmi is trying to tell JSS that the CoA decision based on the Constitution means that she has to rule the DP out? Some of the most twisted logic I have ever seen.

Much of the same happened last year in the first sentencing phase. All we got was a rather lame allocution by the defendant. The other witnesses (Patty, whoever) were too intimidated by death threats to testify. Geeze! What a bunch of baloney.

Even if done in secret, JM would eviscerate these people and the defense knows it. We know it. JM knows it.

The fact is, the JURY would come to know it as well. We, the judge, the media, the deadly tweeters who supposedly send death threats???, have absolutely no control over the outcome of the jury deliberations. Does the defense really believe that if the public, through the media, hears about the testimony, it will change the outcome of the jury deliberations???

Sorry for the semi-coherent rant. I have to chauffer my husband around tomorrow for appointments and will miss a hunk of testimony. Guess I'll be up all night catching up!
 
But it's there. And she doesn't want to die. She doesn't want to live the life that comes with being on death row. That part isn't just about control. No one would want that. It's about self preservation. I still remember the look on her face when the hung jury was announced. It wasn't fake like before, it was pretty genuine. The idea that there are people out there who actually voted for her death is probably pretty harrowing.

She does probably view not getting the death penalty as a win, because every time she loses she has to create a new competition in her mind until she gets a "win."

This is IMO. It's a complicated thing. But basically, she doesn't want to die.
I agree but I'll go one further...she doesn't want to lose. Lose the case, lose to Juan, or lose to the family. You are right that she keeps reaching for a win...she doesn't want to lose.
 
Juan should walk in there, hand JSS & Nurmi a cd containing Darryl's tv interview & pages of Mark Mcgee's social media posts, then turn and sit back at the table.

Drop the mike :bombshell:like a boss!

That would totally be so awesome! I love it!!
 
I agree but I'll go one further...she doesn't want to lose. Lose the case, lose to Juan, or lose to the family. You are right that she keeps reaching for a win...she doesn't want to lose.

I agree 100 percent with this. Death penalty - they win. Anything else - she wins.
 
Travis served his Mission from 1996-1998. This guy says in 2000 he is a pedo and addicted to 🤬🤬🤬🤬.

A big fat lie!!!!!!!
 
I was just thinking the same thing.

I'm picturing JM juxtaposing the hands-only view of DB's live-streamed testimony next to that penis image and just leaving it there on the jumbotron.
I know he would never do that, but it would be funny.
 
I agree 100 percent with this. Death penalty - they win. Anything else - she wins.

Let her win her second-place prize of LWOP, and then wish she'd lost when her appeals go dead-stop nowhere without the support of the DP storm-troopers.
 
Travis served his Mission from 1996-1998. This guy says in 2000 he is a pedo and addicted to 🤬🤬🤬🤬.

A big fat lie!!!!!!!

The pedo 🤬🤬🤬🤬 didn't come up as accusation until recently according to the guy in the article.
 
Wow I sure fell behind... still haven't finished reading the closed thread but wanted to bring forth some links re the memory card and date questions before I lose them. Basically my question now is who owned the DSC-W7? I tried looking for pics showing JA with any cameras, found a few with the Canon, none that I could id as the Olympus(no idea where that info had originally come from or how accurate it was) but did come across a pic of her with Leslie Udy that looks like either a small silver camera(the DSC-W7 is silver...as are some Olympus models) or a cellphone in her left hand. I recommend going directly to the jpg link as the first one gets quite graphic.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Udy-says-imagine-killed-Travis-Alexander.html
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/17/article-2264094-1700CB38000005DC-539_634x389.jpg

http://esupport.sony.com/US/p/support-info.pl?&info_id=12&mdl=DSCW7
http://esupport.sony.com/US/p/support-info.pl?&info_id=12&mdl=DSCH9
These charts show that in fact the same memory card recovered with TA's camera could have been used in the still unknown holder of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W7 digital camera that was apparently responsible for some of TA's flickr pics from Oct '07(no idea how you can tell that, was forum info). The only qualifier is that the DSC-W7 has to use an adaptor.

https://servicesales.sel.sony.com/e..._GB_SERVER2_2&modelNum=DSCW7&searchText=DSCW7
This is a list of all the accessories available for the DSC-W7, see the memory cards, just remember it needs an adaptor shown beside the second one in the list ( MSXM2GS 2 GB MEMORY STICK PRO DUO MEDIA).

http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/sony/dsc-w7/sony-dsc-w7-review.html
This is a very detailed review on the DSC-W7, sounds like it was a great little camera, especially for an aspiring photographer.

-------------
https://us.en.kb.sony.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/36616/c/65,66/p/40096,40097,40353,40398/
This explains about date manipulation in the older DSC-W7 where I think the "photo shoot" pics could have originated.

https://us.en.kb.sony.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/36616/c/65,66/p/40096,40097,40126,40139/
This is the date manipulation info listed for TA's Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H9, sounds the same as for the DSC-W7(to me anyway).

Excellent research, Val! I'm quite curious about the owner of the Sony DSC too. Oh, on the Flickr pics, if you click on one, below it shows the camera data, click on 'Show EXIF' to see more.

Great find on that pic, can't tell what it is she's holding but it does seem a bit thick for a cell phone. I don't know what the Helios looked like so no real clue if it could have been her phone or a camera.

We went through so much with the camera memory card on the Post Verdict thread, one of the posters (whose name unfortunately escapes me) finally came up with a reason for why the pic of the card looks so thick in the evidence bag, it was in a card case (or something of that nature, I'd have to find the post for the terminology used) but it looked different than the adapter shown in your pic, but very intriguing that a card from the DSC can fit into the camera that Travis had, really good work, Val. :)
 
I'm wondering if McGee ever really was going to testify or if this was just part of the game plan. When Juan was listing off the DT witnesses he said, "just the two experts, the witness from California, and the witness who was testifying and then just affidavits." Where does the NZ witness fit in? Were they trying to play it by ear on this witness? Or was he never actually going to testify and the DT just wants to use his name and his alleged knowledge of Travis' pedophilia for appeal purposes only without ever actually having to call him?
 
The pedo 🤬🤬🤬🤬 didn't come up as accusation until recently according to the guy in the article.

I know I just can't stand what these liars are doing to TAs memory and his family.

The NZ guy will tell the jury TA said that in 2000 and I know beyond a shadow of a doubt having missionaries in my family that this never happened.

I just can't stand it!!!

I hate that garbage was even put in a motion, but I expect nothing less from KN.
 
I'm wondering if McGee ever really was going to testify or if this was just part of the game plan. When Juan was listing off the DT witnesses he said, "just the two experts, the witness from California, and the witness who was testifying and then just affidavits." Where does the NZ witness fit in? Were they trying to play it by ear on this witness? Or was he never actually going to testify and the DT just wants to use his name and his alleged knowledge of Travis' pedophilia for appeal purposes only without ever actually having to call him?

I think you're right—he was never going to testify in the first place.

I did think there would be 0 mitigation witnesses. I thought they were counting on JSS never kicking out the media and the public. To me, she seems to be a pretty wise judge.
 
Sounds like Jodi 'adjusted' him.

I'm not so sure that's the exact thing that happened. My view is that he was jealous of Travis and made up the 🤬🤬🤬🤬 story originally and embellished it to child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 when he heard about Jodi's accusations in NZ. JMO
 
Apparently Marc and Travis met at a Family Event hosted by Bishop Vernon Parker. This info is from court chatter, were you can read more. It has been said that Marc approached the DF team when he came to the U.S. for a wedding. It has been said that Marc likes the limelight. Vernon Parker, he is a witness for the prosecution, correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do believe he is. Thanks for this info!
 
I'm not so sure that's the exact thing that happened. My view is that he was jealous of Travis and made up the 🤬🤬🤬🤬 story originally and embellished it to child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 when he heard about Jodi's accusations in NZ. JMO

Well he's changing his story to benefit Jodi, so her influence is either direct or indirect, doesn't really matter which. I certainly wouldn't put it past her to be proactive in the matter.
 
I always thought it looked like his chin was resting on his chest. JMO.

I also thought it could be that Jodi lifted him quickly and it snapped his head forward and the camera caught it at just the right moment. I honestly don't think 1 minute is too little time for all the things that happened before the throat cutting to have happened. These things happen quickly and once that throat is cut, Travis is out within seconds. I also don't think it's not enough time for all those wounds to have happened in such a frenzy. I can see it happening very quickly actually and I don't think this attack took very long.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
157
Guests online
756
Total visitors
913

Forum statistics

Threads
626,007
Messages
18,518,655
Members
240,917
Latest member
brolucas
Back
Top