Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/11-14 ~weekend~

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
If the pic was in a newspaper, that could be where CMJA got the pic to trace. here in Louisiana, inmates can subscribe to newspapers and receive them when the mail is passed out.

MOO

It is no longer listed. Guess the Artfart Dealer had second thoughts.
 
  • #222
It is no longer listed. Guess the Artfart Dealer had second thoughts.

Maybe the photographer @TomTingle2 asked them to take it down.
 
  • #223
Maybe the self disclosure is about MDLR and she had to take it down. Is she still tweeting?
 
  • #224
RE: Cougar-lousious … -luscious … -licious … -licorice … whatever … (BTW not intending to violate WS TOS. Not sure what handle this silly [IMO] alleged professional uses online.)

I’ve dealt with “social media mavens” with a similar attitudes.

IMHO, this woman was hired for her purported ability to counteract MSM & social media backlash to JA. “-lousious” was hired to: Be cute. Act as if you have an “inside track.” Be a BFF for JA. …

Her style of dress, her willingness to break jailhouse rules, her idiotic and insensitive rants (IMO) via Twitter (… if she used the term “🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬”? … f’reeeels?)

Maybe. Just maybe this trial will prove it’s a bad idea to hire Mitigation Specialists who have simplistic minds and simplistic understandings of the “The Job At Hand.”

OMG!!! It just occurred to me. Now that JM referred to this silly [IMO] Mitigation Specialist on the record … Could Cougar-lousious …
-luscious … -licious … -licorice … become yet ANOTHER reason JA hasn’t received the “mitigation” she’s DUE?
 
  • #225
CAPITAL INVESTIGATION ADVOCATE, P.O. BOX 3350, GILBERT AZ 85299
WILLING TO ACCEPT FUTURE SOLICITATIONS VIA EMAIL: __X___ YES _____ NO
ACCEPT PROCUREMENT CARD: __X___ YES _____ NO
REBATE (CASH OR CREDIT) FOR UTILIZING PROCUREMENT CARD: __X___ YES _____ NO ______ % REBATE (Payment shall be made within 48 hrs utilizing the Purchasing Card)
INTERNET ORDERING CAPABILITY: __X___ YES _____ NO ______ % DISCOUNT
OTHER GOV'T. AGENCIES MAY USE THIS CONTRACT: _____YES __X___ NO
1.0 PRICING:
ITEM DESCRIPTION COMPENSATION
1.1 Mitigation specialist services as defined herein. Compensation is predetermined and is not negotiable. Submission of a response/application to provide services for this effort indicates acknowledgement and understanding of such. $55.00/hour
PRICING SHEET: 9522301
Terms: 2% 10 Days Net 30
Vendor Number: 2011001441 0
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Contact Person: Maria De La Rosa
E-mail Address:
Certificates of Insurance Required
Contract Period: To cover the period ending February 28, 2015.
 
  • #226
Sorry, I am just now trying to catch up after work.
Is that "art" actually posted for sale on the killers site? She's not even tracing anymore, someone is simply putting her pic through a photoshop filter. How freaking hilarious and lazy is that. If someone actually pays $500 for that crap, they deserve to waste their money.
 
  • #227
Great ...... Oct 22 is my birthday [emoji20]

Re JA and dates, you can bet it's some reference to something, other than your birthday! :) TA and her met Sept'06, she was baptized Nov'07, they started "fraudulently"(according to JA's letter) dating in Feb'07 and broke up the end of June'07, after which he apparently started dating others in Dec '07... that's two October 22's that could hold some significance to her from their relationship. Where are her diaries and email/myspace/etc records... or better yet, did TA have a journal of some type that may show that day's happenings?
 
  • #228
If the pic was in a newspaper, that could be where CMJA got the pic to trace. here in Louisiana, inmates can subscribe to newspapers and receive them when the mail is passed out.

MOO

IIRC, Estrella Jailmates are not permitted access to news of any kind. I don't believe they get newspapers. For TV, they get the FoodNetwork and that's about it.
 
  • #229
Sorry, I am just now trying to catch up after work.
Is that "art" actually posted for sale on the killers site? She's not even tracing anymore, someone is simply putting her pic through a photoshop filter. How freaking hilarious and lazy is that. If someone actually pays $500 for that crap, they deserve to waste their money.

I was just about to say the same thing. There is no way that is a pencil drawing. It's an exact copy. It's the photo put through photoshop to make it look like a drawing.
 
  • #230
1) Ms. Cougarluscious confessing her sins?
2) Neumeister admitting he was confused on how computers really work?
3) ?

Maybe to seal CMJA testimony already given since she probably will not testify any more.
 
  • #231
I was just about to say the same thing. There is no way that is a pencil drawing. It's an exact copy. It's the photo put through photoshop to make it look like a drawing.



This might be why it was removed from the online offerings. If it's somebody's rendition or interpretation of a photo, that's one thing. If it's the literal photograph run through Photoshop or some other application, that's quite another.
 
  • #232
JA's twelve page handwritten letter to JSS requesting to have Nurmi fired from Her case.
It's much easier to read than the youtube video ~
:crazy: :bang:

http://wildabouttrial.com/court_docs/jodi-arias-nurmi-motion.pdf#

Thank you. That's a really cool look into the mind of a narcissistic psychopath. I'm assuming that her crabbing about his unfollowed leads were like the ones that were obviously planted BS, like the letters she sold? or tried to sell? to the National Enquirer? (Not sure on a lot of that. Maybe somebody can help me clear up the truth of that attempted transaction. IIRC, "somebody" forged letters from Travis admitting to child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 fetishes. Those letters were attempted to be entered as evidence when JA was acting as her own council for the first time. She failed to get them in because there was no evidence that he actually wrote them. So somebody in her camp went to the NE and either tried to sell or sold the letters which the NE never printed due to liability concerns over the validity of the letters.)

I'm so glad you posted this. I've had to walk away for awhile to try to absorb this. BK's commentary made me very nervous and I was praying she just didn't understand.

In my mind I'm thinking BN has used his working copy to manipulate the data and even tried to erase the incinerator to hide the fact that he used it. How much more hinky could you get? But maybe that is just my mind trying to make this go away?

I guess my question is, would BN be able to come to court and show, now, where this data is on the original copy? If he used his working copy to dig through the minutia and didn't add or delete anything I would think he should be able to prove it's on the original.

And when the state witness said there was 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer, was he referring the things the virus put on there or things that were actually sought out?

Obviously, I just don't get it!

I think your right. I think this is why BN got so excited and angry about the clone of a clone of a clone. He had to consult with Nurmi and Wilmott before answering Juan.

Just read on Facebook that De La Rosa has been banned from the jail again-here is a link to the story:
http://www.examiner.com/article/jod...continues-maria-de-la-rosa-takes-center-stage
Hope it is ok to post that here!

And this is the most important part of that great article. I suggest everyone read the whole thing, but this is by far the best part of the arrticle;

...Has the defense proven Brady violations beyond a reasonable doubt?

If you answer yes to that question, you are saying that you believe the evidence existed on the original computer of Travis Alexander, before he died, and that you know without a shadow of a doubt that Juan Martinez had something to do with the evidence disappearing. At this point, to agree to these premises, you would also have to believe that Travis Alexander invented the Incinerator program, years before its time, and was hiding it in his Recycling Bin before revealing it to the world. You would also have to have a very reasonable explanation as to how his Incinerator program was manually put in the Recycling Bin from the after life. You also are saying that this evidence solves the murder of Travis Alexander and Jodi should go home for Christmas....


Maybe it really is her that filed the "self disclosure" under seal.

Ok, I need some help here. What is "self disclosure" and why would it be put under seal. :waitasec: TIA
 
  • #233
The defense will never be able to prove that some other program rather than "the Incinerator program" was used to "shred" the files and the prosecution will never be able to prove that those 🤬🤬🤬🤬 files never existed in the first place. This whole thing is such a farce... a truly Sophie's choice lies before the judge... I can't even begin to imagine how any Judge can't make a ruling on something like this...
 
  • #234
I think the "Self Disclosure" is going to be BN admitting he used the incinerator program, therefore manipulated evidence, which means we can kiss this motion goodbye.
 
  • #235
I think the "Self Disclosure" is going to be BN admitting he used the incinerator program, therefore manipulated evidence, which means we can kiss this motion goodbye.

I'm thinking that it has something to do with BN too, but that's just an instinct. Could be off.
 
  • #236
Not only does JA think she's an artist but a talented photographer as well. In neither skill has she exhibited any type of unique proficiency. Everything she does is a copy and not copied well.

I just had the best surprise. Took a container of bean out of the freezer earlier. Just opened them up and found Chicken and dumplings. YUMMY!:happydance:
 
  • #237
Thinking more about the self disclosure filing...maybe it is JA filing notice of her intent to not testify further in open court. I do not know how she will get around being cross-examined unless JM does not need to cross. I don't know why anything filed by the state would be under seal but then have to consider that JSS seems to feel that everything has to be sealed for now, so who knows.
 
  • #238
I'm hungry.
 
  • #239
Case Documents

Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
12/12/2014 005 - ME: Hearing - Party (001) 12/12/2014
12/10/2014 005 - ME: Hearing - Party (001) 12/10/2014
12/10/2014 029 - ME: Status Conference - Party (001) 12/10/2014
12/9/2014 012 - ME: Trial - Party (001) 12/9/2014
12/9/2014 SDO - Order to Seal Documents - Party (001) 12/12/2014
NOTE: NOTICE OF SELF DISCLOSURE


https://www.superiorcourt.maricopa....rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2008-031021
 
  • #240
Is the trial scheduled to be back on track Monday 12/15?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
2,172
Total visitors
2,294

Forum statistics

Threads
632,211
Messages
18,623,553
Members
243,057
Latest member
persimmonpi3
Back
Top