I'm so glad you posted this. I've had to walk away for awhile to try to absorb this. BK's commentary made me very nervous and I was praying she just didn't understand.
In my mind I'm thinking BN has used his working copy to manipulate the data and even tried to erase the incinerator to hide the fact that he used it. How much more hinky could you get? But maybe that is just my mind trying to make this go away?
I guess my question is, would BN be able to come to court and show, now, where this data is on the original copy? If he used his working copy to dig through the minutia and didn't add or delete anything I would think he should be able to prove it's on the original.
And when the state witness said there was




on the computer, was he referring the things the virus put on there or things that were actually sought out?
Obviously, I just don't get it!