Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/11-14 ~weekend~

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #101
:seeya:

Dropping in and out today, in the hopes that JSS will rule on the misconduct motion. She surely can come to a quick decision on that.

Have to admit to being biased, but I tried to follow the computer evidence and arguments with an open mind. For the life of me I can't see any misconduct. The only thing close was Flores waking the lap top up in 2008 but, as that was not against protocol at that time, there's no misconduct there IMO. The 2009 nonsense doesn't merit either. Just he said/she said, with some personal agendas going on. Why would Juan be looking at evidence in the presence of defence counsel! He must have access to evidence whenever he chooses.

🤬🤬🤬🤬, specifically child 🤬🤬🤬🤬? Where? In Nurmi's dreams!

Come on, JSS. Open the courtroom; let's hear from Arias' resistant and/or imaginary witnesses and get this thing on the road!
 
  • #102
Radley Balko ‏@radleybalko 26m26 minutes ago
I'm reviving the Worst Prosecutor in America poll for 2014. Now taking nominations. Also taking "best" or "fairest" prosecutor suggestions.

Hey guys: Tweet your suggestions to Radley Balko. I did!!!!!!
 
  • #103
Radley Balko ‏@radleybalko 26m26 minutes ago
I'm reviving the Worst Prosecutor in America poll for 2014. Now taking nominations. Also taking "best" or "fairest" prosecutor suggestions.

Hey guys: Tweet your suggestions to Radley Balko. I did!!!!!!

I love that Robert McCulloch is winning so far for worst. I'm gonna agree with that one. He presented defense evidence to a grand jury. Lol...what? Why are you presenting this case if you don't even want an indictment?

Anyway...
 
  • #104
What we did learn yesterday that while mistakes were made they were not big mistakes that call for prosecution misconduct....And there was not child 🤬🤬🤬🤬......So BN will be called back to tell the jury that the prosecution expert missed 166,000 sites of 🤬🤬🤬🤬 and he will tell the jury that TA actually keyed this in (which the jury will try to keep a straight face) and go on and on...than JM will get up and BAM we have already seen part of his cross examine but he has not shown all of his cards. He did bring up the registry and history,but he did not bring up who had access to this computer such as CMJA, and how TA could have viewed 🤬🤬🤬🤬 after he was killed. I thought BN was not available until after the Jan. so who will be the next witness? As the COA issued their written opinion yet? I thought JSS had it.
 
  • #105
What happened to the "thanks" at the bottom.
 
  • #106
The straw game, you draw the shortest straw and you lose. Nurmi drew all the short straws yesterday. How pathetic is this trial? When you think it can't go lower it does. Sickening....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • #107
  • #108
Meanwhile Wilma's still looking for that darn sim card :smile:

That was the best part of yesterday. CMJA even looked up at that stupid question.
 
  • #109
I have a question? Does the history and registry show the date and time these sites were accessed?
 
  • #110
"The mitigation specialist compiles a comprehensive and well-document psycho-social history of the client based on an exhaustive investigation; analyzes the significance of the information in terms of impact on development, including effect on personality and behavior; finds mitigating themes in the client’s life history; identifies the need for expert assistance; assists in locating appropriate experts; provides social history information to experts to enable them to conduct competent and reliable evaluations; and works with the defense team and experts to develop a comprehensive and cohesive case in mitigation." http://www.tonymosslaw.com/mitigation-consulting/what-does-a-mitigation-specialist-do

Maria has done the following:

1. Giggles and gossips with Arias in court. Smuggles contraband.
2. Leaks sealed information to a pro-defense reporter aka Keifer.

I don't see, fundraising, passing secret files to family, "facebook, twitter and media consultant", public relations person, personal assistant....confidant....BFF....etcetcetc
 
  • #111
I think he's anti-state. I think he fancies himself a State whistleblower cloaked in the guise of a neutral journalist. And I think, to him, Juan Martinez represents everything wrong with the law and order in Phoenix. But there are actual prosecutors out there doing wrong and Juan isn't one of them. Nothing in his record amounts to a pattern of misconduct or anything criminal, far as I've seen. MK is just a bully.

I agree! And that annoys me so much. He's supposed to be objective but he uses azcentral, which is visited by thousands, to push his little agenda.
 
  • #112
I don't see, fundraising, passing secret files to family, "facebook, twitter and media consultant", public relations person, personal assistant....confidant....etcetcetc

Now THAT is misconduct.
 
  • #113
  • #114
It's the farthest right icon with leftquotes in a speech balloon and a plus sign. When you hover your cursor over it, a hint reads "Multi-Quote This Message." Then you click on the messages to which you want to reply and hit the Multi-Quote button for each. You'll see a checkmark. Then click "Reply With Quote."

1JPAO6w.png

Thank you for explaining how to do multi-quotes. Ive always wondered how people were doing that and it can come in handy.

Thanks so much.
 
  • #115
Did CMJA say on her testimony in court that there was child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer or did she just say 🤬🤬🤬🤬? It was so long ago.
 
  • #116
In ~OT~ news, the Eric Williams penalty phase continues, the judge asked both parties this morning if either had an objection to ending court at noon today, as a juror's mother's funeral was this afternoon. A defense attny stood and began a long objection about having 24 witnesses scheduled for the day and they had been reprimanded yesterday for running out of witnesses at 3:00 p.m. and they'd have to intercept each as they came in and explain and...the judge interrupted him by saying he was not the lead attny, then asked the lead attny if he had any objection. He mumbled barely audible words to the effect of he did for reasons stated by co-counsel (I think), judge overruled the objection.

Yesterday the judge told defense that so far all witnesses were saying the exact same thing and at some point it becomes cumulative testimony, but that didn't dissuade defense from scheduling many witnesses for today, saying pretty much the same things. I think they're calling everyone who ever came into contact with the accused/convicted, but they are apparently having no trouble having witnesses testify in mitigation for a man who gunned down a prosecutor and then two months later gunned down the district attorney and his wife (both around 70 years old) in revenge killings because they prosecuted him for county-owned computer monitor theft (and he lost his law license and job), the trial is being live streamed and has garnered plenty of press in this state. Funny how Nurmi et al is having such a difficult time getting anyone to say nice words about JA under somewhat similar circumstances.
 
  • #117
When should we hear JSS decision? Monday?
 
  • #118
Did CMJA say on her testimony in court that there was child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer or did she just say 🤬🤬🤬🤬? It was so long ago.

Dr. Samuels said that JA told him there was child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer. LaViolette said JA told her TA had actual pictures. JA herself has said that TA had actual pictures (after testimony that no child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 was fond on the computer).
 
  • #119
So does this mean that BN never has to turn over to the prosecution the actual HD that he supposedly used to make the lists of 🤬🤬🤬🤬 he found on TA's computer that he presented in court? No matter which way this decision goes, that doesn't seem right. That whole debacle was based on those lists.

:waitasec:
 
  • #120
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
1,726
Total visitors
1,818

Forum statistics

Threads
632,348
Messages
18,625,068
Members
243,098
Latest member
sbidbh
Back
Top