Curious, I *think* krkrjx was trying to say that St. Jude's should address the situation (which has probably taken the path towards MSM exposure) because it effects the integrity of their organization, EVEN THOUGH, no one at St. Jude's donation center had a clue that the donation had nefarious intent. Pre-strike "Damage control".
Can you imagine if that "receipt" is used at the trial as "evidence"? Anyone watching the trial and not knowing the under handed way this donation was given would be demanding a boycott of St. Jude's. We saw what "mob mentality" did to some of the defense witnesses the first go round.
I'd hate to see St. Jude's get blasted by MSM, or others. We know the backstory, so to speak, but others out there, including MSM, are usually a day late and a dollar short when it comes to the facts and what WSers already know.
My personal opinion? St. Jude's should return the donation with a letter, cover their bases, and avoid any bologna that MIGHT come up. They need to avoid this situation at all costs. They do so many awesome things for children and I'd hate to see them drug through the mud.
