SIDEBAR #29- Arias/Alexander forum

[grammieto5]

----------
I have donated also, they didn't mention any amount. If you send as a memorial they send a Thank you, no amount metioned. She probably had her own printed by a "friend".:shame:

any amount.

Right! What they do is send you little gifts, like address labels, or note cards, stickers, just a little thank you.

 

[YESorNO]

---------
I just read the letters Y/N printed out about St. Jude. The second one http: ****************JODI ARIAS IS
no longer available!! I wonder why!

** 's because I forgot the rest.LOL it is still on the post..:shame:

http://**************/jodi-arias-charitable-donations/

If you are talking about the 2nd page, it's still on her website, but can't post a copy because it *** out

 

[YESorNO]

All's quiet this AM on the missy:jail: front (so far :floorlaugh: )

MC Superior Court ‏@courtpio Sep 15
Next Court dates in State v. #jodiarias are 9/16/2014 at 10:30 and 9/22/2014 at 10:45.

Should be something going on in court today, so check out the Retrial thread later on for updates- maybe Jen will be at court today?:


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?256796-Retrial-for-Sentencing-of-Jodi-Arias-2

Wait.
Today is the 17th. :nevermind: I'm really losing it this AM. It is Wednesday, isn't it? :scared::scared:

Disregard this message (except "have a happy Wednesday") - check back on 9/22 instead - :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:

 

[grammieto5]

I agree, I don't see them selling their dignity, or their reputation, for $900. Not to mention, that amount is just pennies to an organization that large. jmo

I agree, plus since her garbage is being auctioned off for thousands of dollars I would think they could donate more than $900. And it was done with a credit card. So they'll be making payments on their donation????

 

[HoneySugar]

K, I'm new to this thread but have been following this case for quite a while. Please forgive me if this is a dumb question, but I was wondering if there will be a court hearing when the judge decides whether or not cameras will be allowed? If not, then any ideas how we'll find out her decision? TIA!

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

 

[YESorNO]

K, I'm new to this thread but have been following this case for quite a while. Please forgive me if this is a dumb question, but I was wondering if there will be a court hearing when the judge decides whether or not cameras will be allowed? If not, then any ideas how we'll find out her decision? TIA!

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

We don't know- only thing told was that JSS will rule on cameras at the end of the week, but I'm sure the press will let us know that day.

:greetings:

:welcome4:

 

[YESorNO]

Jodi Arias Phone Recording (Fox 10) September 5th 2014

[video=youtube;dwD15lXybxE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwD15lXybxE[/video]

 

[neesaki]

Come to think of it, she is the one who is by all accounts, the nymphomanic. It seems her whole life was based on using sex to get something for nothing. Not only that, maybe she is the one who is the pedophile, I mean, who knows ? It happens every day, right ? Far be it from me to say that she's not one. And I seriously wouldn't put anything past a <modsnip> like her . JMO

hoh:, Sorry about that Lambchop. :blushing1:

 

[YESorNO]

Really Big Mean Dog Publishing Presents: The Big Book of Words
(note: some foul language)


http://reallybigmeandog.com/2014/09...og-publishing-presents-the-big-book-of-words/


:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[YESorNO]

What a difference! Incarceration is not doing missy :jail: any good:

 

[MeeBee]

Really Big Mean Dog Publishing Presents: The Big Book of Words
(note: some foul language)


http://reallybigmeandog.com/2014/09...og-publishing-presents-the-big-book-of-words/


:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

The defintion of Hotti Biscotti :floorlaugh: So accurate.

 

[Dmacky]

Have you all seen this article? I'm sorry if it is a repeat, as I haven't had time to catch up on all the posts. It is a very a very lengthy read, and right now I am too tired to finish it. The comments are interesting too ~ I also posted in retrial for sentencing thread....Again my apologies if it old news to everyone!


http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi...list-under-scr

 

[grammieto5]

What a difference! Incarceration is not doing missy :jail: any good:

In the photo with the blond hair I see red eyes, in the other one I see, like one poster said earlier shark eyes. Both are photos of pure evil.

 

[Kensie]

The killer probably photo shopped the picture on the Right. UGLY UGLY. Just think in about 10 years after being in prison, she will look HORRIBLE..

 

[neesaki]

Have you all seen this article? I'm sorry if it is a repeat, as I haven't had time to catch up on all the posts. It is a very a very lengthy read, and right now I am too tired to finish it. The comments are interesting too ~ I also posted in retrial for sentencing thread....Again my apologies if it old news to everyone!


http://www.examiner.com/article/jodi...list-under-scr

This link isn't working for me, Dmack. :dunno:

 

[krkrjx]

Wow, really? St Jude's might use that money for research and save a child from cancer or some terrible fate. I am angry at all that Jodi has done, first of all for slaughtering Travis. But I would bet Travis would want St Jude's to use that money regardless where it came from. It would be all the better if the jury just gets a clue how manipulative JA is.

Yes. Really.

I am sure they can use all donations, including mine which happen yearly rather than just a one-time thing when I am trying to prove something that is in reality just another big fat lie.

They have PR people. I want to hear what they have to say about this.

ETA: Since my opinion on this is frowned upon I thought I should add this.

St. Judes is a highly respected organization. Its founder, Danny Thomas, continues to be highly respected as is his daughter Marlo. This organization and the people behind it have always done good things and have never ever been named or even hinted at in any way even remotely scandalous. Their donations come from citizens worldwide. What I feel about a killer donating to them in an effort to save her own skin is what I feel--sorry if it offends. However, I do believe they should return the donation with a statement of why they need to do so. It is best to just stay clear of all possible scandal or at best, raised eyebrows.

I suppose it is possible I am the the only person in the entire world who feels this way. But, I doubt.

 

[Hatfield]

Yes - this! This is the first thing that popped into my mind, but I don't think she will present it as wanting Travis to be remembered for doing something positive for children. I think she will do everything in her power to emphasize Travis the pedophile to the jury and how she is trying to make amends for his pedophilia (because in her crazy calculating mind she is without flaw and surely the jury will see this).

I can already tell this is JAs plan. She is almost guaranteed to try to somehow bring up false pedophile allegations against Travis again.

From what I remember in the previous trial, I do not understand how the judge allowed what the defense was saying and implying about Travis. It seemed they were pure lies from JA as she had no real basis for what she was implying. I can barely remember what she tried to bring in as her so called evidence and i think it was selectively edited from a transcript or something. It definitely was not any solid proof of any kind.
So how was it even allowed to be alleged from her and is there anything that can be done to stop it from happening again?

I hope Juan is ready for this. Maybe he will be able to stop her.

 

[LambChop]

I can already tell this is JAs plan. She is almost guaranteed to try to somehow bring up false pedophile allegations against Travis again.

From what I remember in the previous trial, I do not understand how the judge allowed what the defense was saying and implying about Travis. It seemed they were pure lies from JA as she had no real basis for what she was implying. I can barely remember what she tried to bring in as her so called evidence and i think it was selectively edited from a transcript or something. It definitely was not any solid proof of any kind.
So how was it even allowed to be alleged from her and is there anything that can be done to stop it from happening again?

I hope Juan is ready for this. Maybe he will be able to stop her.

Not sure she can even use that as a mitigating factor because there is no proof of anything. Plus she lied at different times regarding what she saw. First person she told TA was on his computer when she saw images. When that was disproven after searching his computer JA changed it to a picture that floated to the floor. I would hope her defense team would not even mention it since it did not go well for her the first time even using the misinformation from the Hughes. I would think JM is well prepared this time to face that issue if it comes up. jmo

 

[Hatfield]

Not sure she can even use that as a mitigating factor because there is no proof of anything. Plus she lied at different times regarding what she saw. First person she told TA was on his computer when she saw images. When that was disproven after searching his computer JA changed it to a picture that floated to the floor. I would hope her defense team would not even mention it since it did not go well for her the first time even using the misinformation from the Hughes. I would think JM is well prepared this time to face that issue if it comes up. jmo

Thank you. This helped me remember how she tried to make the allegations. I kind of remember both those futile attempts now.

 

[Hope4More]

Just watched the documentary "Dear Zachary." The killer in it and the murder she committed (of Andrew Bagby) are eerily similar to CMJA and her slaughter of Travis.

What comes after the murder is your worst nightmare of what would have happened if CMJA had been pregnant with Travis' baby.

Warning......This story is completely heartbreaking. I didn't know the end of it or I might not have watched the whole thing. The similarities to CMJA sucked me in. Though this is completely and absolutely not like me....I'm still crying.