I got a nice response from my senator Flake about the Endangered Species Act:
Thank you for contacting me about the Endangered Species Act (ESA). As you may know, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) serves to protect and conserve species identified as threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service. While protecting wildlife and endangered species for future generations is imperative, I tend to believe that the states should take a primary role in managing these natural treasures. All too often, federal regulations become economic restrictions while providing little or no environmental benefit and ignoring the concerns of local stakeholders and state contributions to conservation. Moreover, the Fish and Wildlife Service has the authority to add or remove animals from the ESA should it ever encounter population data that demonstrates the need for such action.
Thank you for taking the time to share your comments. Please do not hesitate to do so again in the future. I also encourage you to visit my website at
flake.senate.gov.
Sincerely,
JEFF FLAKE
United States Senator
It applies to what we're looking at with the whole Salt River Horse situation.
Wolves? I think that should be Fed + State by State, giving the State *more* power to protect endangered species beyond the Federal, but not less.
Arizona Game and Fish protect my right to have wolf dogs, or any domestic/wild cross breed, where in several other States it does not. When I was active in the Wolfdog Alliance, the only city in Arizona which had a ban on wolfdog ownership was Tucson, don't know if that's still in effect.
Sarah Palin really chapped my hide with her wolf hunt rhetoric. If she claims the wolves are cutting into the elk herds in Alaska, maybe they need to cut back on the elk permits given out each year to out of state hunters. The Alaskan tribes should have their hunting rights, people off the grid 2nd, legal residents 3rd.
It's not the wolf that is bringing down the elk numbers, it's placing the hunt number higher than what nature can maintain.
Cattleman in Wyoming, Montana, and the like? Again, restrict the hunt number for elk and deer so the wolves can go after their natural prey..........but lets face it, cattle have been domesticated to the point of stupid. Take away their horns and they have no defense. Cattlemen are against wolves, and elk and bison<--brucellosis is passed on by those 2. This costs cattleman $$$ in vaccinations, they don't like that. Without wild herds to sustain the wolves, they go after cattle, which is like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. Cattleman don't want to be bothered with wolf deterrents.
Then you have the situation back East where the wolf was all but disseminated, and the population of deer and coyote have gotten to the point of being dangerous and suburbanized. Put the wolf back in, and it will adjust.
Wolves, by nature, sustain themselves more on rodents, rabbits, mice, birds, etc., than big game. The old, young, and sick are what they go after as far as the bigger animals. The only predator for the wolf is man, which tends to keep coyotes, bears, mountain lions, and bob cats away from the territories.
Had to get that off my chest............:scared: