so unknown print could have been a latent partial from a store clerk or anyone else in the store that touched the bottle..
JY's absence of prints on the outside of the bottle... could indicate wipedown, etc...
I still am very interested in why an adult med that JY would have samples of is in a pediatric syringe. (adults do not take liquid meds with syringes in general)
thanks otto for the link..
this trial is very interesting and seems HIGHLY circumstantial...
I'm a little behind here and didn't listen to court today. But I did see the first trial.
In a circumstantial case, it's the NUMBER of circumstances that are involved pointing to guilt, that often times in totality, could only mean the accused is guilty as charged.
The problem with the first trial was, the defendant spent the entire trial taking notes of each witness. Then, the surprise defense move to have the defendant testify in his own behalf. So he had days and hours to figure a way to explain away each and every circumstance. IF the pros had done their job correctly, imho, they would have been prepared for the def to testify and counter each and every accusation leveled against him.
The def, NOT ONE time, never, ever, spoke to LE. The day he arrived at the home after being summoned by LE, because of his wife's murder, he REFUSED to speak to LE. HE said he already had a lawyer. HE wouldn't even take LE through the crime scene to verify if anything was missing, ie a robbery.
I just pray this time, the pros has all their ducks in a row. JY has already played his hand and didn't let him pass go, so now he's up for a rematch. Hopefully, the jury will get it right.
Just a little background.
fwiw
fran