GUILTY UK - Brianna Ghey, 16, murdered in Culcheth Linear Park, Feb 2023 *2 teenagers charged*

There seems to be lots of aggravating factors for boy y. the transphobic language he used against Brianna, (girl x always used the correct pronouns) the blood evidence on his clothes and shoes which strongly suggests him being the one that stabbed her. It was his weapon and he brought it with him on the day of the murder.
I think someone mentioned earlier they think his culpability would be less than girl x. I disagree. They also have these messages of him suggesting various poison to kill her with showing strong premeditation. Huge aggravating factors imo. If guilty, I’d say he’s even more of a danger to the public than she is.
 
DH: “But you told them you’d been there. That wasn’t a lie, was it?”

Intermediary: “Could you rephrase the question?”

DH: “What did you think you had done wrong that caused you to lie about having the knife?”

Y: “The knife had been brought to Culcheth by me, which was used by Girl X to stab BG, which I thought I would get told off for.”

DH: “You told us that you didn’t know Girl X was going to stab Brianna. Why couldn’t you just tell the police that?”

Intermediary: “He’s point to I don’t understand the question.”


This is a tad infuriating now… I’m struggling to believe he doesn’t understand this many simple and unambiguous questions.
 
Y: “I do not know what the feeling of fear feels like physically.”

Also Y -

Y: “I was scared for many reasons at the police station, so I didn’t want to be even more scared by being told off.”


Not sure how anyone can read through his testimony today and believe he isn’t playing it up.
It’s inconsistency after inconsistency now.
 
I know girl x and boy y are currently in secure child units at the moment, what happens if they are found guilty?
Will they be sent to a young offenders?
Will they be sent to prison when they turn 18?
We know boy y has been diagnosed with autism. Is that enough to warrant being sent to a hospital as opposed to a prison?
 
I know girl x and boy y are currently in secure child units at the moment, what happens if they are found guilty?
Will they be sent to a young offenders?
Will they be sent to prison when they turn 18?
We know boy y has been diagnosed with autism. Is that enough to warrant being sent to a hospital as opposed to a prison?
I think some of the secure units also hold young offenders . I do not think being autistic would warrant being sent to hospital . I also think some young offenders units have psychiatric care.
 
I know girl x and boy y are currently in secure child units at the moment, what happens if they are found guilty?
Will they be sent to a young offenders?
Will they be sent to prison when they turn 18?
We know boy y has been diagnosed with autism. Is that enough to warrant being sent to a hospital as opposed to a prison?
HereAutism cannot be ‘cured’ as such. It’s a life long condition and often undiagnosed. There is a higher number of prisoners with neurodiverse conditions than in the population as a whole, but accurate statistics are not available . The Government recently commissioned a report re the subject. Link above at ‘Here’ ( link clearly wants to be at the top! Can’t seem to put it further down post)
 
Y: “I do not know what the feeling of fear feels like physically.”

Also Y -

Y: “I was scared for many reasons at the police station, so I didn’t want to be even more scared by being told off.”


Not sure how anyone can read through his testimony today and believe he isn’t playing it up.
It’s inconsistency after inconsistency now.
I am sure members of the jury will see the inconsistencies ,he is doing himself no favours.
 
The questions for you are whether you are sure that she or he knowingly participated in the killing and did so with the intention that Brianna should die or at least be caused really serious injury.

“People may play different parts in a crime. Both admit they were present at the scene, but mere presence is not enough to amount to participation. You must be sure either he or she stabbed Brianna or caused, helped or encouraged the defendant to inflict the fatal stab wounds and had the relevant intention at the time.

The prosecution do not have to prove who stabbed Brianna, whether it was one or both of the defendants. What matters is whether you are sure the defendant played a part in the killing, intending that Brianna die or be caused really serious injury.

 
What was the point in bringing the jury in today for 45 minuites ?? :oops:
Maybe she hopes that the defence speeches and her summing up can be done on Monday morning /early afternoon and the jury sent out later on Monday

I personally do not think it will take the jury long to decide their verdicts.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
493
Total visitors
659

Forum statistics

Threads
625,589
Messages
18,506,736
Members
240,821
Latest member
Berloni75
Back
Top