MajorLang
Former Member
No because that could be considered Libellous-Surprised your asking me????What circumstances tho? ... please say what circumstances you think would cause such accute embarressment
No because that could be considered Libellous-Surprised your asking me????What circumstances tho? ... please say what circumstances you think would cause such accute embarressment
Are you connected to "friends and family" in any way as you seem to be an ardent supporter and defender whenever they are mentioned???I will never believe the family know who harmed her and not telling the police
The message board has been closed for many years .And I think the reason was because it was too successful!The whole thing stinks doesnt it..
I tried to contact Martin Dales via this web page. A note at the top of the page says the message board is now closed..
CLAUDIA LAWRENCE MISSING PERSON
Perhaps a conflict of interest as maybe some of info not reported to police????The message board has been closed for many years .And I think the reason was because it was too successful!
People were putting possibly important information about the case without telling the police / first !
And if these ‘embarrassing revelations are so powerful’ they would be a very strong case for Claudia to choose to disappearHer cause of death and who did it must override any potential embarrassing revelations, what claudia was up to in her private life, if indeed she was up to anything at all, it does not even come remotely close in my opinion
I go for the jealous boyfriend every timeI would add Jealousy and Anger to that list too.
Was someone jealous that she had managed to get the money together to go on holiday to Cyprus.
Was that a boyfriend who was married and wouldnt be able to go, was it a boyfriend who couldnt afford to go, or was it a girlfriend?
It would only be libellous if it was a false fact...No because that could be considered Libellous-Surprised your asking me????
No !Are you connected to "friends and family" in any way as you seem to be an ardent supporter and defender whenever they are mentioned???
In fact very early on in the investigation police voiced concern that people were putting potential important information before contacting them !Perhaps a conflict of interest as maybe some of info not reported to police????
This is part of the problem ... too many cooks !The whole thing stinks doesnt it..
I tried to contact Martin Dales via this web page. A note at the top of the page says the message board is now closed..
CLAUDIA LAWRENCE MISSING PERSON
I would say someone looking for ClaudiaIve been watching the short video clip of the siting of the man and woman arguing on University a couple of queries
Its shows a red vehicle in the clip was, it ever confirmed the colour was red
The passenger door was said to be open.. was this because Claudia was possibly the passenger ond exited in a hurry, or was the male the passenger and he exited the vehicle in a hurry when he recognised CL.
If the male was a passenger in the car who was the driver.
Also your thoughts on who would be travelling that road at that time of the morning?
Other than someone travelling to or from work, I can only come up with someone who was specifically looking for CL.
Probably the Perps and more likely to be a red van with a logo on the sideI would say someone looking for Claudia
As for the car having a driver plus a passenger the witness would have seen the driver too not just the open door
Possibly a left hand drive vehicle?
Good point PJ could be a left hand drive, Being part on the verge and part road the driver only had a short time to take in the car and the people on the other side of the road who were arguing, presumably he had checked his mirror and indicated to pass the car so if distracted by the couple as well as making a maneuvere he may not have taken in too much detail of the vehicle or other persons in it. I haven seen any record of the type of the car or its true colour so this makes me think he was more focused on the couple than the vehicleI would say someone looking for Claudia
As for the car having a driver plus a passenger the witness would have seen the driver too not just the open door
Possibly a left hand drive vehicle?
You missed quite a few off the list and why does it have to be a man?I think a man definately gave or loaned her money..
Ive ruled out her father because I think she already owed him big time.
So is that R.Campbell who had the means and was in the UK at the time of her disappearance and would have an interest in her visiting Cyprus so he could see her again.
Or is it a soft touch like Michael Snelling who should easily manipulate.
Or is it an unknown man?...
I believe that most of the money went to pay for the holiday to Cyprus...
Or Girlfriend(s)I go for the jealous boyfriend every time
Or Girlfriend(s)I go for the jealous boyfriend every time
Claudia dissapeared at a point between o5:07 and 05:42 on 19th March. if we focus around that window we may solve this case rather than having multiple scenarios.Good point PJ could be a left hand drive, Being part on the verge and part road the driver only had a short time to take in the car and the people on the other side of the road who were arguing, presumably he had checked his mirror and indicated to pass the car so if distracted by the couple as well as making a maneuvere he may not have taken in too much detail of the vehicle or other persons in it. I haven seen any record of the type of the car or its true colour so this makes me think he was more focused on the couple than the vehicle
Had she limited her options? had she previously borrowed monies from family and friends and not repaid it, I dont think they would be open to lending her more money. The booking of a holiday and another planned for the summer and still owing money would not have gone down well with some I'm sure. I have suggested before that perhaps she wanted to avoid the meeting with SC on the evening of the 18th because she had booked a holiday to Cyprus.You missed quite a few off the list and why does it have to be a man?
Claudia dissapeared at a point between o5:07 and 05:42 on 19th March. if we focus around that window we may solve this case rather than having multiple scenarios.
Looking at the cctv for that time period there is much police have avoided showing that they could have if they wanted help to solve this case but they have decided not to share and not only for evidence preservation.
Car at university was a ploy to take us away from what really happened.