UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #6

[MajorLang]

I would have thought genuine friends who really want to help police find Claudia would freely offer their dna .

Foot and shoot comes to mind

 

[MajorLang]

I would have thought genuine friends who really want to help police find Claudia would freely offer their dna .

Foot and shoot comes to mind

I don’t know why people keep mentioning jk specifically

Smoke and Fire come to mind

 

[Pinkizzy]

Maybe, but if asked to volunteer DNA to be excluded you'd look mighty suspect if JK refused? And no reason for her to not volunteer as her DNA in CL car or house would be expected. MOO

A Judge çan force someone to provide a sample of DNA

 

[Popejohn3]

A Judge çan force someone to provide a sample of DNA

The dna in her car will only come up trumps if it belongs to someone new .
If you know this ‘new’ person or it’s you and he / she has harmed CL he / she should tell police where she is BEFORE they put a name to that dna
There will soon be a media furore this coming March

 

[MajorLang]

The dna in her car will only come up trumps if it belongs to someone new .
If you know this ‘new’ person or it’s you and he / she has harmed CL he / she should tell police where she is BEFORE they put a name to that dna
There will soon be a media furore this coming March

There always is MSM interest in March and usually a police statement but I'm not sure the police will release much this March-Unless they arrest the one who has escaped arrest thus far. Now that would be justice.

 

[Andyboy]

The dna in her car will only come up trumps if it belongs to someone new .
If you know this ‘new’ person or it’s you and he / she has harmed CL he / she should tell police where she is BEFORE they put a name to that dna
There will soon be a media furore this coming March

Can't see anyone coming forward to put themselves under police scrutiny after 11 years of silence

 

[MummyRatcliffe]

I don’t know why people keep mentioning jk specifically

I think it's understandable why JK comes under scrutiny... her partner and 3 other associates were arrested for CL murder after all. It makes the average person wonder if she knows more than she's letting on. It doesn't make her guilty of anything of course but of course people will wonder. MOO

 

[Popejohn3]

Can't see anyone coming forward to put themselves under police scrutiny after 11 years of silence

But if police do not have a name for the dna they have now or dna with the body the perpetrator would probably get away Scot free.
The family would get some closure

 

[MajorLang]

I think it's understandable why JK comes under scrutiny... her partner and 3 other associates were arrested for CL murder after all. It makes the average person wonder if she knows more than she's letting on. It doesn't make her guilty of anything of course but of course people will wonder. MOO

I wonder if anyone has analysed the footage of all of the documentaries and media interviews. JK comes under scrutiny because she says strange things IMO. In social media sites when people have been trying to help find Claudias killer she takes an angry stance and there does appear to be more of an element of "moving on" rather than wanting to work with all of the thousands of people who are going over evidence and trying to help. When SC gets involved in social media it is far too often "guarded responses" or no response to questions.
The police have stated that they believe that Claudias killer is someone she knows and that those close to her are saying nothing.

What are we supposed to read into all of this, other than to class the behaviour as highly suspicious.
Now that may because it is those close to her are actually fearful of the actual perpetrators.

But for the sake of Claudia there is a very good witness protection scheme in operation.

 

[Popejohn3]

I wonder if anyone has analysed the footage of all of the documentaries and media interviews. JK comes under scrutiny because she says strange things IMO. In social media sites when people have been trying to help find Claudias killer she takes an angry stance and there does appear to be more of an element of "moving on" rather than wanting to work with all of the thousands of people who are going over evidence and trying to help. When SC gets involved in social media it is far too often "guarded responses" or no response to questions.
The police have stated that they believe that Claudias killer is someone she knows and that those close to her are saying nothing.

What are we supposed to read into all of this, other than to class the behaviour as highly suspicious.
Now that may because it is those close to her are actually fearful of the actual perpetrators.

But for the sake of Claudia there is a very good witness protection scheme in operation.

Re your last sentence:sorry but I don’t want to be relocated to God knows where would be their response.

 

[Popejohn3]

Re your last sentence:sorry but I don’t want to be relocated to God knows where would be their response.

Now SC has ‘relocated’ so to speak .
And as SC said herself, she is a bit apprehensive because, if the police are right that the perpetrator was known to CL then the chances are SC knows him too.But could be anyone she and others do not know who actually did it.Suspicions are not enough,
I think it was someone new to Claudia .

 

[keep-it-real]

I don’t know why people keep mentioning jk specifically[/QUO

Fixation maybe?

 

[Popejohn3]

From what I've read it was a sex tape involving CL and multiple men, I must stress tho that this has never been verified. An urban myth you might say though a reddit user did claim to know a disgruntled wife who found the DVD in her husband's car if I remember correctly. MOO

And we all know who the wife is and surly she would say something if it’s all lies ?

 

[keep-it-real]

And we all know who the wife is and surly she would say something if it’s all lies ?

We have to consider if the tape does exist it may be used as evidence in the future.
If this is the case then then the wife would have been advised not to disclose its existence or content.

 

[MajorLang]

Re your last sentence:sorry but I don’t want to be relocated to God knows where would be their response.

Are you the elected spokesperson for JK PR and SR @Popejohn3 You give off that impression so many times?

 

[MajorLang]

We have to consider if the tape does exist it may be used as evidence in the future.
If this is the case then then the wife would have been advised not to disclose its existence or content.

Yes and its highly unlikely that she would wish to broadcast that her partner stared in a DVD. out of shame, whatever their relationship today.

 

[Popejohn3]

Are you the elected spokesperson for JK PR and SR @Popejohn3 You give off that impression so many times?

Sorry if I do that ...I do not know any of them

 

[keep-it-real]

Yes and its highly unlikely that she would wish to broadcast that her partner stared in a DVD. out of shame, whatever their relationship today.

Why should she feel shame..shes done nothing wrong. If anything shes a victim too.
Its comments like that, that stop people coming forward with any evidence of a personal nature they may have.

 

[Popejohn3]

Why should she feel shame..shes done nothing wrong. If anything shes a victim too.
Its comments like that, that stop people coming forward with any evidence of a personal nature they may have.

You can see now ‘that ‘ dvd is probably the ‘complexity’ the police talked about on tv weeks months into the investigation which took it ( the investigation ) to a completely different direction .
We know ( if true ) it was shot about one year earlier but when was it ‘discovered’ ? Again if true?

 

[MummyRatcliffe]

And we all know who the wife is and surly she would say something if it’s all lies ?

I think I know who the wife is but I'm not sure.... Was it BH? Thanks