keep-it-real
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Messages
- 1,738
- Reaction score
- 3,551
I believe she did .
Can you provide evidence of this please PJ.
I believe she did .
@SimeonOPatrick Happens all the time in hereInteresting that after my posts today several members have posted..... Trying to distract from the truth????? The truth to this case is very much nearer than we think IMO..........may even be someone on here and contributing to the chat and getting off on that
Not true because the "fifteen minutes of fame-Oxer, said it as did Dan WhitehandTheres no doubt that running more than one relationship alongside each other is a bit like a juggling act but some people become quite adept at doing this and uses each relationship when it benefits them ie: either for emotion sexual or financial reasons its a pattern that becomes easy to repeat as these needs arise be it with the same persons or new acquintances.
Its enevitable that at some stage this type of behaviour will end badly.
In Claudias case and the information we have available
We know that she had a conversation with DO which he said she had disclosed she had spent the night of the 16th with a lover. DO in the programme Missing or Murdered offered up this information.
It was the presenter of the programme who said not her casual boyfriend but a different person.
The only person that appears to have said that she had a boyfriend was Dan (her ex) I havent heard JK or SC or Jo her mother father or sister say she had a boyfriend which seem a little odd if she had had this boyfriend for some months
Did she really say she had a boyfriend!
They areVery sad and sadistic but the cops should be looking into all IT addresses and interviewing everyone
No evidence but why should we not believe two different sources saying the same thing ?Can you provide evidence of this please PJ.
I would have thought you would be pleased to have created a bit more interest.Interesting that after my posts today several members have posted..... Trying to distract from the truth????? The truth to this case is very much nearer than we think IMO..........may even be someone on here and contributing to the chat and getting off on that
Im trying to be absolutely sure PJ.. David Oxer did not say on the Missing or Murdered programme that it wasnt her casual boyfriend that she was out with on the nite of the 16th he just says she went out with a male friend.No evidence but why should we not believe two different sources saying the same thing ?
Theres no doubt that running more than one relationship alongside each other is a bit like a juggling act but some people become quite adept at doing this and uses each relationship when it benefits them ie: either for emotion sexual or financial reasons its a pattern that becomes easy to repeat as these needs arise be it with the same persons or new acquintances.
Its enevitable that at some stage this type of behaviour will end badly.
In Claudias case and the information we have available
We know that she had a conversation with DO which he said she had disclosed she had spent the night of the 16th with a lover. DO in the programme Missing or Murdered offered up this information.
It was the presenter of the programme who said not her casual boyfriend but a different person.
The only person that appears to have said that she had a boyfriend was Dan (her ex) I havent heard JK or SC or Jo her mother father or sister say she had a boyfriend which seem a little odd if she had had this boyfriend for some months
Did she really say she had a boyfriend!
Were the two brothers who ran the nightclub Cypriots?
@MEKON your all over the place with your theories and that won't help find the answer
David told the police what Claudia had said to him one year after she disappeared.And before they announced it they had already established that this person was not the casual boyfriend !Im trying to be absolutely sure PJ.. David Oxer did not say on the Missing or Murdered programme that it wasnt her casual boyfriend that she was out with on the nite of the 16th he just says she went out with a male friend.
The presenter then says 'The Police' believed Claudia had a casual boyfriend at the time but believed the person she spoke to DO about was someone else.
So are the police basing the fact that she had a boyfriend on what they were told by Dan her ex.
No one else friends or family has offered up a name or existence of a boyfriend.
I would have to consider if the only source of this info came from the ex and theres nothing else to substantiate it I would not close this line of investigation in my file.
They say the devil is in the detail and I want to get to finer details but examing things right back to source. Someone may have slipped and I want to be sure I followed it through until I add it to research line.
I havent been able to find any documentation that DO said she had a casual boyfriend just that police said she did.
If anyone has a link to documented evidence of it being different if they could link it here I would be grateful.
A decade is just ten yearsClaudia case is decade(s) old now although doubt bones are her.
I've always thought she was just dropped in the river given the sniffer dogs were seemingly detecting that although buried in foundations of University extension is a viable alternative.
Can you tell us what is the truth or at least hint on itInteresting that after my posts today several members have posted..... Trying to distract from the truth????? The truth to this case is very much nearer than we think IMO..........may even be someone on here and contributing to the chat and getting off on that
David told the police what Claudia had said to him one year after she disappeared.And before they announced it they had already established that this person was not the casual boyfriend !
Dan had told them very early on that she mentioned a new boyfriend four months before she was gone
No one is saying David ever referred to casual boyfriend .Sorry to press the point PJ I know DO disclosed CL had told him that she had spent the nite with a male on the nite of the 16th. DO says this in the Missing or murdered programme( I have this programme on tape and have viewed it over and over) but he doesnt say that this male was not the casual boyfriend.
The programme is narrated by an ex scotland yard detective and he is the one that says police believe that the mystery man of the nite of 16th was not her casual boyfriend it was someone else.
If people believe DO did say that CL had a casual boyfriend other than the mystery man of the nite of the 16th I would be grateful if they could post a link here to any written or video evidence supporting it
Because I havent found it as yet anywhere.
My reasoning being this is if he didnt say it the source of the information comes back to one person (the ex Dan)and if this is the only source of this piece of information that was given to the police investigation I would give me good cause to investigate it further .
Sorry to press the point PJ I know DO disclosed CL had told him that she had spent the nite with a male on the nite of the 16th. DO says this in the Missing or murdered programme( I have this programme on tape and have viewed it over and over) but he doesnt say that this male was not the casual boyfriend.
The programme is narrated by an ex scotland yard detective and he is the one that says police believe that the mystery man of the nite of 16th was not her casual boyfriend it was someone else.
If people believe DO did say that CL had a casual boyfriend other than the mystery man of the nite of the 16th I would be grateful if they could post a link here to any written or video evidence supporting it
Because I havent found it as yet anywhere.
My reasoning being this is if he didnt say it the source of the information comes back to one person (the ex Dan)and if this is the only source of this piece of information that was given to the police investigation I would give me good cause to investigate it further .
Interesting that after my posts today several members have posted..... Trying to distract from the truth????? The truth to this case is very much nearer than we think IMO..........may even be someone on here and contributing to the chat and getting off on that