Probably evidence of how happy she was.
If he tries to use Helen's own words in his defence that would be sick beyond all imagination.
Probably evidence of how happy she was.
If he tries to use Helen's own words in his defence that would be sick beyond all imagination.
What can it be, what can it be?? Something IS said that can be refuted...Hmm
I think it must be prosecution evidence. Something that someone noticed and brought to their attention. Defence have had long enough to have prepared before today surely.
A fictional piece of writing that was on the bookshelf of IS, where the plot is eerily similar to his fantastical tale?
Oooh, oooh ..... wasn't somebody from here going to email the prosecution about some points?
I was thinking, last night, about ISs appeal to Helen. All that stuff about my heart doesn't even exist.
And I wondered if he had lifted those lines from somewhere. Maybe one of Helen's teen fiction books.
But , even if he did, that would hardly be evidence to support the case against him - would just show that he's cr*p at writing and showing emotions.
A fictional piece of writing that was on the bookshelf of IS, where the plot is eerily similar to his fantastical tale?
Yes. COTTON! where are you?!
Did you only mention the weather reports?
AAArrrg. Just come back , assuming there would be loads of updates on Cambridge news and instead, just as Duchy predicted, they have shut up shop for the afternoon again. The book. :tantrum:
Anyway my first reaction is this is Helen's book and this is IS's doing. I do hope not but it's par for the course, he's been filching from that book from the get-go.
Just checked my emails next and had one from Stuart T's iphone at 7.30am - saying thanks for the information. ( Very polite of him really, didn't expect any response at all. )
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.