It will be interesting to hear where @RAISINISBACK is on this now that the case is taking a little more shape; always has an interesting take in my opinion. It seems that part of the reason AC &Co. have been on this methodical, plodding journey has been to (a) put the jurors in the investigators shoes to see how they came to the conclusion that George was involved and to counter the (b) Jake is weird but George was a nice guy who loved the Rhodens narrative.Interesting read. Yup. George is done, too much added up against him. I still think all the jury has to believe is that he went along on the murders to be convicted of the murders. And too much of what Jake and Angela say is backed up by BCI evidence which goes along with his planning it and knowing about it.
Put a fork in it. Enjoy maximum security.
I keep coming back to the fact that they arrested him without Angela's and Jake's testimony.
Angela's plea makes perfect sense because prosecutors believe she wasn't there and could avoid life. George has little too lose by not making a plea deal -- its life in prison likely if he's convicted (because of Jake's deal) and likely life in prison if he makes a plea. From his perspective, why not roll the dice?
But, yes, @Cool Cats , if i were on this jury and heard TW, heard about the family dynamics, knew about the forged custody document George signed, heard the evidence abour buying guns and saw that 8-ball skull tattoo, I would be leaning hard in the same direction as you.
We haven't even gotten to the oil filters, the testimony from EW that probably includes George's threat to investigators and Dewine and the recordings of Jake and George.