Search results

Fantastic. Is he going to arm the protesters? :rolleyes:

Nope. The firing pattern doesn't show that. Look at the evidence.

As I posted before, if MB was shot from behind and then turned around, his arm would now be on the OPPOSITE side of where the officer was shooting... requiring a readjustment for the officer to be able to start back shooting where he had left off. All of that just couldn't happen in an...

The solution is easy. Parents taking responsibility for their own children and not trying to place blame on others when their children misbehave. It's called a spanking. Never in a million, zillion, trillion years did I ever, ever, ever think to speak in a disrespectful manner to...

I don't even think it's possible if MB is FLEEING, as some are saying he was. Where would his arm have to be in order to sustain a gunshot wound, from behind, while fleeing? Wouldn't he be running? Don't most people run with the arms close to their body and their fists clinched? Even if he...

Is that because white people are racist or because it's a reputation that's been earned?

Can you provide the link that states MB was compliant, raising his hands above his head? TIA!

You keep stating that he "should have have just been shooting at him while he was running away." Please provide link that states this is what happened. Thanks!

Do you have a link saying that he "fired wildly"? Thanks!

Do you have a link to cite law or is this just your opinion? Just wanting clarification.

BBM and THAT is one of the points of this whole thing.

I think you're right in that he will end up being charged for it. But, not because he SHOULD be. But, because if he isn't, there will be even bigger massacres. I mean, Obama's already in on this...

That's not the way it works. LE is not *required* to stop pursuit just because the suspect runs away. (Even though that's clearly not what happened in this case.) Can you imagine if the laws were structured that way? "I just killed that guy, but I ran away. You can't run after me...

If they are really interested in the ENTIRE truth coming out... then why not discuss the ENTIRE truth? Why don't they address the robbery he committed and the assault he committed just moments before? I mean, if we're REALLY interested in getting to the bottom of everything, those INDISPUTABLE...

That is NOT what was said. It's said it "could have". However, the totality of the evidence shows that is not the case.

Didn't happen. Even Baden's report shows that didn't happen.