Search results

It's so weird that something like this happened in a town and a place like this. It's so weird how people just go on with their lives when we know there is a murderer or kidnapper or "disappearer" walking amongst us. No one ever even talks about this anymore and it seems like we'll never...

My first thought when I heard the "Could Travis have moved the camera" question was, "Oh, please send this juror back to Pinellas County where he came from." Now the WS discussion makes me wonder if this juror was actually contemplating whether or not TA could have taken the photos during...

No, it is not possible that the shell ended up on top of the blood while she was cleaning up, because blood was only present under the casing. It wasn't present above or around it. It landed in blood and stayed there. It matters whether she shot him first or last for intent. She shot him...

Lol. . .this has been a repeat occurrence in this case, to the point where there have been many jokes here on WS about it. The bottom right and corner is very likely Juan's pen as he had the picture on the overhead projector. This happens all the time. :floorlaugh:

The "shoot firsters" in this thread concern me in regards to the jury. I cannot fathom ignoring actual evidence and expert testimony in order to substitute my own theory. . .and I hope no one on the jury thinks that way. "Well, I know the medical examiner who has done 6000 autopsies says one...

I believe the jury isn't supposed to know she's in jail because it implies that she committed a crime. She hasn't been convicted of any crime, so it is not fair to the defendant to have that implication in the jury's mind. With that said, given the many barely cryptic remarks about her living...

No, the headshot was taken after the sitting-at-the-bottom-of-the-shower picture. It was the last photo taken before his murder. The following pictures were the accidental ones.

I will never understand these conspiracy theories. You are wrong on several counts. First of all, it is impossible for the picture of him in the shower to be taken after she shot him. Why? Because that picture was taken BEFORE the headshot and the headshot clearly shows no bullet wound...

After waiting for so long for Juanday, my car broke down and I missed EVERYTHING. A couple questions: 1. Where can I watch a total replay of today's testimony? 2. Did we find out what the closed door hearing was about?

Actually, the gun she used to kill TA would have incapacitated him immediately. The ME very clearly explained why during his testimony. TA was shot AFTER he was stabbed, not before.

For all the lawyers out there: What could this close door portion be about?

Is this the moment we've all been waiting for??????

Shut up, Jodi. WHEN IS JUANDAY??? :banghead:

Kudos to all the WSers that commented how JA's memory seemed to fade as she got closer and closer to murder day and was strongest 5 years before. Kudos to all the WSers who said JA would pretend not to remember the murder at all. What struck me most about her testimony today was her comment...

Jodi admitting to the creepy sneaking into the house and watching TA while he was unaware makes me certain of one thing. . .TA didn't know he was being photographed in the shower. . .and the look he was giving the camera in the last photograph was shock that JA was in the bathroom holding her...

We have to be sooooooooooooo close to murder day now. :great: Which puts us one step closer to Juanday!!! :rocker:

It's not just the cruelty or lack there of that makes this completely vital to the defense's case. That is what is causing your confusion here. There are several reasons that the defense wishes he was shot first, which include: 1. Aforementioned "less cruel" theory. 2. If he was shot last...

BBM Very true. That's why the fact that no one did this in this trial is so telling about whether D and E exist. The defense had an expert testify regarding the computer evidence, which is less important than the ME's evidence. Whether she shot him first or last is crucial to this case and if...

Don't you think the ME may have seen decomposed bodies at some point during his 6000 autopsy career. . .and knows what to expect from them? And knows how to examine and state his findings? In this case, there are three compelling points of evidence the medical examiner testified to, which all...

This isn't technically a physical impossibility (or at least I don't have a direct quote from the ME saying it isn't) but it's highly, highly improbable based on what Oceanblue explained. This whole thing occurred within a matter of a few minutes.