Home today due to sinus infection and bronchitis, and am very happy that I don't have to deal with Nurmi droning on and on. Jury questions should tell us a lot! I'm on pins and needles waiting to hear them, and to hear her answers.
I wanted to address something else regarding the WM gas can. Normally, if we want to look up a transaction, we can only look up the transaction from the store it was purchased at. For instance, if she had purchased the can at my store, I could look up the transaction there, but not if she had purchased it at a different store. The more information provided - date of purchase, credit/debit card number, UPC number, register or operator number, makes things much easier. Cash purchases are difficult to look up, but with enough information, it's not impossible. Now, this is in-store, and our LP (loss prevention) would be able to pull up video of the actual purchase and return.
If the in-store resources come up with nothing, I would imagine that WM corporate would be able to search their database and narrow it down, if they were asked to. Unfortunately, I don't know for sure.
I'm floored that my silly job is actually providing even a miniscule bit of info in such a huge case. It may not mean anything, but it's there![]()
On to the jury questions!!!
This is completely wrong.
Have you viewed all the autopsy photos?
BBM
Does anyone know or can speculate why they think she washed him off? Maybe cause she was washing her DNA off also? This has always baffled me.:banghead:
We should have premeditation facts and ideas for Juan. hahaha No seriously.
Ryan Burns states the trip had been planned two weeks in advance.
The grandparents' home was broken into and a gun was stolen (actually, the glass was on the OUTSIDE of the house indicating the window had been broken out from the inside of the house.
There was a post on TA's myspace that you can only see if you get the cached version. It was this from Marie A:
May 31 2008 8:45PM
It's on first week of June!
I wonder if this angered JA?
marriage proposals and baby names are positive. why didn't they make the journal?
did she write it on a torn out page where she practiced writing 'mrs. travis alexander' 300 times? with hearts over the i's?
Ouch!
Only in JA's head do things bounce and roll when dropped. I always felt like she is talking as if she is picturing these things in slow motion...
The camera that fell, bounced rolled and "came to a rest" by the tub?
or the pieces of paper that fell in the chaotic pattern.
As if its slow motion.
it's snowing here in the other Washington too!! :what:
.
Many of us believe she did shoot him first, but it didn't kill him right away and the gun jammed. So she began stabbing, sternly commanding him to shut p and die. This version matches best her second story of the ninja intruders which I think she created to try to math the forensics and any nieghbors who lift have heard something. Also, people who lie often interject a bit of truth into their lies. Finally, the gun shot trajectory matches Travis sitting in the shower facing out, as he was in the last photo of him. It doesn't match how he was found, stuffed back in the shower, with his head wound facing away from the shower door.
But if she did stab him first after intending to shoot him, many things could have caused that to happen. Perhaps she felt she had to act suddenly and all she had at hand was the knife. Maybe he told her to leave before she had time to grab the gun but she has the knife on her. Maybe she tried to shoot him first but the gun jammed and so she had to start stabbing and when she was finished, she coldly fixed the jam and decided to put a bullet in his brain for good measure.
I haven't followed this case for very long. Just heard Jodi on the stand. So if this has been hashed out a long time ago. I am sorry to ask it again. Why would Jodi steal a gun if she meant to stab him first? That would seem to me she meant to shoot him. If she was playing out his story in the video, then he would have to be alive when she pulled out the gun.
I tend to think she shot him first. If I have it correctly, the shot was in the jaw-cheek area. Why not a better shot to the head if his throat was already cut? I agree she can add some truth to make her story fit and also in her mind say she is telling the truth.
He was probably praying he would never see her again
HLN host just said, "Let's get real here. You're all following the Arias trial to hear all the salacious/sexual details." I started following the case to see justice for Travis and his family. I want to see HOW it could be self-defense. I NEVER WANTED TO HEAR THEIR SEX LIFE!!!
HLN host just said, "Let's get real here. You're all following the Arias trial to hear all the salacious/sexual details." I started following the case to see justice for Travis and his family. I want to see HOW it could be self-defense. I NEVER WANTED TO HEAR THEIR SEX LIFE!!!
BBM
Does anyone know or can speculate why they think she washed him off? Maybe cause she was washing her DNA off also? This has always baffled me.:banghead:
The bullet, according to the ME, entered in the area of Travis' right temple and followed a downward trajectory to lodge in the left cheek. I find it hard to believe a moving target would be so easy to shoot in the temple. A stationary target on the other hand, piece of cake.