2011.04.08 Frye Hearing Thread

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
CFNews13Casey Twitter:

Cindy Anthony continues to take notes in gallery
 
Jose just said that the dog handler went to the site "where he knew remains had once been!"
 
did JB just say the dog failed to hit in the backyard where we KNOW remains were found
 
JB - Questioning the credibilty of Forgey, with regard to the car line-up
 
restating his schtick on only one car being in the "line up" and no mention of the blue car that he testified to
 
JB: what is an unverified alert? when evaluating a dog you must look at the handler. the only way we can evaluate a dog is by double blind testing. the only reliable way and method which is highly questionalble based on the facts and you must rely on the integrity of the handler.

dect. melich all testify there was only one car, this has been admitted into evidence, each one drew up for the court there was only one car that was analyzed. in deputy forgies report he only testifies to one car.
 
Judge's error rate? OMG how tactless can this man be?
HHJP looks like he is listening just out of politeness and protocol at this point, but he knows more science and certainly more law than JB..

Actually, it was JA who brought up a judges error rate. In explaining how an error rate pertains to methodology vs a person, JA said that would be like determining a Judge's error rate by how many times he overrules the prosecution. JA IMO is a funny guy.
 
Jose admits to remains being in the backyard. I think this qualifies as BOMBSHELL
 
omg...we have to have a line up of cars for the dogs to sniff, did I understand that correctly?
 
OK isn't this supposed to be an argument on whether or not the actual "tests" are usable/admissible. Not the results, right?
 
JB - Would bet the house that per Forgey's grand jury testimony there was only one car. His honor can look at that in-camera.
 
JB - Det Forgey credibility attacked on several grounds -

Several detectives said only one car - Forgey said only one car in report but in testimony said a blue car and JB says he would 'bet the house' in Grand jury testimony would only be one car in it.

Says Det Forgey never mentions any false positives in any report
 
Things are always "odd" or "strange" to Baez - here he goes again.
 
JB: would bet the farm that the grand jury testimony only reports one car. he is what is odd about deputy forgey...he went the second day and never documented his unverified alert where he hit in the back yard. what is that? that calls into question all the records. how reliable are those non blind double testing records.
 
"there are, you have, he went out" all together starting one sentence. WTheck Baezzz, spit it out. I can't what he's saying. I would love to see his court transcripts.
 
positive/negatives= error rates. Mr. Baez is very big on this. Now attacking credibility of dog handlers. Sheesh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
201
Guests online
1,268
Total visitors
1,469

Forum statistics

Threads
606,736
Messages
18,209,863
Members
233,948
Latest member
PandorasBox83
Back
Top