I don't even see this as the problem - she was given appropriate credit for the check fraud and immediately following she was given "appropriate credit" for time served on the lying to LE charges which brought her up to her release date. So legally if she was serving those two sentences including the one that was ROLLED back, how the heck was she serving probation at the same time? To me - serving those two sentences didn't give her time to be swanning around in jail on probation.
Hello HHJP - Elephant in the Courtroom?
Or to look at it another way - how was she serving time for check fraud plea deal AND 4 counts of lying to LE (to run consecutively) at the same time?
My (unpopular) opinion is that she has served her probation while in jail. Additionally, she has served the time required for the check fraud charges (concurrently with time in custody/jail pending trial). What she has not served are the 4 years for lying to law enforcement.
Judge Perry is right about one thing - it is a mess. But as Grandmaj mentioned, they better get it straightened out before this "mess" becomes legal precedence.